Advertisement

Generative Programming

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2323)

Abstract

This report describes the results of a one-day workshop on Generative Programming (GP) at ECOOP’01. The goal of the workshop was to discuss the state-of-the-art of generative programming, share experience, consolidate successful techniques, discuss the relation of GP to object-oriented programming and other emerging approaches such as Aspect-Oriented Programming or Multidimensional Decomposition, and identify open issues for future work. This report gives a summary of the workshop contributions, debates, and the identified future directions.

Keywords

Design Pattern Generative Programming Partial Evaluation Software Product Line Code Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Alexandrescu. Modern C+ + Design. In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul G. Bassett. Framing Software Reuse: Lessons form the Real World. Prentice-Hall, 1997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Czarnecki and U. Eisenecker. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2000Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. C. Cleaveland. Program Generators with XML and Java. Prentice-Hall, XML Book Series, 2001Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. De Volder. Aspect-Oriented Logic Meta Programming. In Meta-Level Architectures and Reflection, P. Cointe (Ed.), LNCS 1616, Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp. 250–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Gosling, B. Joy, G. Steele, and G. Bracha. The Java (TM) Language Specification, Second Edition. Addison-Wesley, 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. Jones, C. Gomard, and P. Sestoft. Partial Evaluation and Automatic Program Generation. Prentice-Hall, 1993Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U. Schultz. Object-Oriented Software Engineering Using Partial Evaluation. PhD thesis, University of Rennes I, Dec. 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Simonyi. The Death of Computer Languages, The Birth of Intentional Programming. Technical Report MSR-TR-95-52, Microsoft Research, 1995Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Veldhuizen. C++ templates as partial evaluation. In ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Semantics-Based Program Manipulation (PEPM’98), ACM Press, 1999, pp. 13–18Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Volanschi, C. Consel, G. Muller, and C. Cowan. Declarative specialization of object-oriented programs. In OOPSLA’97 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, 1997, pp. 286–300Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences KaiserslauternZweibrückenGermany
  2. 2.Concordia UniversityCanada
  3. 3.DaimlerChrysler Research and TechnologyGermany

Personalised recommendations