Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SDL as UML: Why and What Panel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
«UML»’99 — The Unified Modeling Language (UML 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1723))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is a very popular series of movies in which one of the main characters is a blundering French detective who entertains the audience to great comic effect as he speaks English contorted to a French grammatical form. While this may not necessarily be an appropriate analogy for the case of SDL and UML convergence, it highlights one of the principal hazards when merging languages of different lineage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burns A. and Wellings A.: Hrt_hood: A structured design method for hard real time systems. In Real-time Systems. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lanusse A., Gerard S., and Terrier F.: Real-time modeling with uml: The accord approach. In UML’98 International Workshop, Mulhouse, France, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Abadi and L. Lamport.: Composing specifications. ACM Transaction on Programming Languages and Systems, 15(1):73–132, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Asarin, M. Bozga, A. Kerbrat, O. Maler, A. Pnueli, and A. Rasse.: Data-structures for the verification of timed automata. In HART’97. Springer-Verlag LNCS 1201, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Douglass B.: Real-Time UML: Developing Efficient Objects For Embedded Systems. Adison Wesley, March 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Selic, G. Gullekson, and P.T Ward.: Real-Time Object Oriented Modelling. John Wiley and Sons, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gamma E., Helm R., Johnson R., and Vlissides J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Adison Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Evans and A.N. Clark.: Foundations of the unified modeling language. In 2nd Northern Formal Methods Workshop, Ilkley, electronic Workshops in Computing. Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Geppert, F. Rossler, R.L. Feldmann, and S. Vorwieger.: Combining sdl patterns with continuous quality improvement: An experience base tailored to sdl patterns. In First Workshop of the SDL Forum Society on SDL and MSC, SAM’98, Berlin, Germany, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Hogrefe and S. Leue.: Specifying real-time requirements for communication protocols. Technical report, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Jard, JM. Jezequel, and L. Nedelka.: An approach to integrate formal validation in an oo life-cycle ofprotocols. In FMOODS’96, Paris, France, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K.G. Larsen, F. Larsson P. Pettersson, and W. Yi.: Efficient verification of realtime systems: Compact data structure and state-space reduction. In 18th IEEE real-Time Systems Symposium, RTSS’97. IEEE Computer Society press, December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. TELELOGIC: TAU/SDT 3.3. TELELOGIC, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ObjecTime Limited, Canada

    Bran Selic

  2. ENSIETA, France

    Philippe Dhaussy

  3. Ericsson AS, Billingstad, Norway

    Øystein Haugen & Birger Møller-Pedersen

  4. Verilog, Toulouse, France

    Philippe Leblanc

Authors
  1. Bran Selic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Dhaussy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anders Ek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Øystein Haugen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Philippe Leblanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Birger Møller-Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1873, USA

    Robert France

  2. Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, D-80290, München, Germany

    Bernhard Rumpe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Selic, B., Dhaussy, P., Ek, A., Haugen, Ø., Leblanc, P., Møller-Pedersen, B. (1999). SDL as UML: Why and What Panel. In: France, R., Rumpe, B. (eds) «UML»’99 — The Unified Modeling Language. UML 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46852-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46852-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66712-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46852-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation