Skip to main content

Current Directions in Hyper-Programming

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perspectives of System Informatics (PSI 1999)

Abstract

The traditional representation of a program is as a linear sequence of text. At some stage in the execution sequence the source text is checked for type correctness and its translated form is linked to values in the environment. When this is performed early in the execution process, confidence in the correctness of the program is raised. During program execution, tools such as debuggers are used to inspect the running state of programs. Relating this state to the linear text is often problematical. We have developed a technique, hyperprogramming, that allows the representations of source programs to include direct links (hyper-links) to values, including code, that already exist in the environment. Hyperprogramming achieves our two objectives of being able to link earlier than before, at program composition time, and to represent sharing and thus closure and through this the run-time state of a program. This paper reviews our work on hyper-programming and proposes some current research areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Morrison R., Connor R.C.H., Cutts Q.I., Dunstan V.S., Kirby G.N.C. Exploiting Persistent Linkage in Software Engineering Environments. Comp. J. 1995; 38,1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Metrowerks Inc. CodeWarrior Pro 5, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farkas A.M., Dearle A., Kirby G.N.C., Cutts Q.I., Morrison R., Connor R.C.H. Persistent Program Construction through Browsing and User Gesture with some Typing. In: A. Albano and R. Morrison (ed) Persistent Object Systems, Proc. 5th International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems (POS5), San Miniato, Italy. Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp 376–393

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirby G.N.C., Connor R.C.H., Cutts Q.I., Dearle A., Farkas A.M., Morrison R. Persistent Hyper-Programs. In: A. Albano and R. Morrison (ed) Persistent Object Systems, Proc. 5th International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems (POS5), San Miniato, Italy. Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp 86–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morrison R., Brown A.L., Connor R.C.H., Cutts Q.I., Dearle A., Kirby G.N.C., Munro D.S. Napier88 Reference Manual (Release 2.2.1). University of St Andrews, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Atkinson M.P., Daynes L., Jordan M.J., Printezis T., Spence S. An Orthogonally Persistent Java. ACM SIGMOD Record 1996; 25,4:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutts Q.I., Connor R.C.H., Kirby G.N.C., Morrison R. An Execution Driven Approach to Code Optimisation. In: Proc. 17th Australasian Computer Science Conference (ACSC’94), Christchurch, New Zealand, 1994, pp 83–92

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stroustrup B. The C++ Programming Language. Addison-Wesley, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, Revision 2.2. Object Management Group (OMG), 1998

    Google Scholar 

  10. Microsoft Corporation. DCOM Technical Overview., 1996

    Google Scholar 

  11. Atkinson M.P., Bailey P.J., Chisholm K.J., Cockshott W.P., Morrison R. An Approach to Persistent Programming. Comp. J. 1983; 26,4:360–365

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Atkinson M.P., Morrison R. Procedures as Persistent Data Objects. ACM ToPLaS 1985; 7,4:539–559

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg A., Robson D. Smalltalk-80: The Language and its Implementation. Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1983

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. OBrien P.D., Halbert D.C., Kilian M.F. The Trellis Programming Environment. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 1987; 22,12:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dearle A., Brown A.L. Safe Browsing in a Strongly Typed Persistent Environment. Comp. J. 1988; 31,6:540–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretl B., Maier D., Otis A., Penney J., Schuchardt B., Stein J., Williams E.H., Williams M. The GemStone Data Management System. In: W. Kim and F. Lochovsky (ed) Object-Oriented Concepts, Databases and Applications. ACM Press and Addison Wesley, 1989, pp 283–308

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper R.L. On The Utilisation of Persistent Programming Environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of University of Glasgow, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirby G.N.C., Dearle A. An Adaptive Graphical Browser for Napier88. University of St Andrews Report CS/90/16, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zirintsis E., Dunstan V.S., Kirby G.N.C., Morrison R. Hyper-Programming in Java. In: R. Morrison, M. Jordan and M. P. Atkinson (ed) Advances in Persistent Object Systems, Proc. 8th International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems (POS8) and 3rd International Workshop on Persistence and Java (PJW3), Tiburon, California, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  20. Connor R.C.H., Cutts Q.I., Kirby G.N.C., Moore V.S., Morrison R. Unifying Interaction with Persistent Data and Program. In: P. Sawyer (ed) Interfaces to Database Systems, Proc. 2nd International Workshop on User Interfaces to Databases, Ambleside, Cumbria, 1994. Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp 197–212

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kirby G.N.C. Reflection and Hyper-Programming in Persistent Programming Systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of University of St Andrews, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison R., Balasubramaniam D., Greenwood M., Kirby G.N.C., Mayes K., Munro D.S., Warboys B.C. ProcessBase Reference Manual (Version 1.0.4). Universities of St Andrews and Manchester, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morrison R., Balasubramaniam D., Greenwood M., Kirby G.N.C., Mayes K., Munro D.S., Warboys B.C. A Compliant Persistent Architecture. To Appear: Proc. Software Practice and Experience, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  24. Connor R.C.H., Cutts Q.I., Kirby G.N.C., Morrison R. Using Persistence Technology to Control Schema Evolution. In: Proc. 9th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Phoenix, Arizona, 1994, pp 441–446

    Google Scholar 

  25. Connor R.C.H., Atkinson M.P., Berman S., Cutts Q.I., Kirby G.N.C., Morrison R. The Joy of Sets. In: C. Beeri, A. Ohori and D. E. Shasha (ed) Database Programming Languages, Proc. 4th International Conference on Database Programming Languages (DBPL4), New York City. Springer-Verlag, 1993, pp 417–433

    Google Scholar 

  26. Atkinson M.P., Lecluse C., Philbrow P., Richard P. Design Issues in a Map Language. In: P. Kanellakis and J. W. Schmidt (ed) Bulk Types & Persistent Data. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991, pp 20–32

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stemple D., Fegaras L., Sheard T., Socorro A. Exceeding the Limits of Polymorphism in Database Programming Languages. In: F. Bancilhon, C. Thanos and D. Tsichritzis (ed) Lecture Notes in Computer Science 416, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT’90), Venice, Italy. Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp 269–285

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stemple D., Stanton R.B., Sheard T., Philbrow P., Morrison R., Kirby G.N.C., Fegaras L., Cooper R.L., Connor R.C.H., Atkinson M.P., Alagic S. Type-Safe Linguistic Reflection: A Generator Technology. To Appear: Proc. The FIDE Book, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  29. Connor R.C.H., Sibson K., Manghi P. On the Unification of Persistent Programming and the World-Wide Web (LNCS). In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proc. Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB’98), Valencia, Spain. Springer-Verlag, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simeoni F. Extracting Typed Data from Semi-Structured Collections. MSc thesis, University of University of Glasgow, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  31. Connor R.C.H., Manghi P., Simeoni F. A Kinded Approach to Extracting Typed Subsets from Semi-Structured Data. in preparation. Please contact the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stallman R.M. EMACS: The Extensible, Customizable Self-Documenting Display Editor. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 1981; 16,6:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Altrasoft. Hyperbole, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bray T., Paoli J., Sperberg-McQueen C.M. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0. W3C, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stemple D., Sheard T., Fegaras L. Linguistic Reflection: A Bridge from Programming to Database Languages. In: Proc. 25th International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii, 1992, pp 844–855

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kirby G.N.C., Connor R.C.H., Morrison R. START: A Linguistic Reflection Tool Using Hyper-Program Technology. In: M. P. Atkinson, D. Maier and V. Benzaken (ed) Persistent Object Systems, Proc. 6th International Workshop on Persistent Object Systems (POS6), Tarascon, France. Springer-Verlag, 1994, pp 355–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morrison, R. et al. (2000). Current Directions in Hyper-Programming. In: Bjøner, D., Broy, M., Zamulin, A.V. (eds) Perspectives of System Informatics. PSI 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1755. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46562-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46562-6_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67102-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46562-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics