Skip to main content

Dynamic Disturbance Decoupling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 498 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 285))

Abstract

The attenuation of load disturbance is always of a primary concern for any control system design, and is even the ultimate objective for process control, where the set-point may be kept unchanged for years. As such, this and next chapters will deal with decoupling disturbances from the plant output in dynamic and asymptotic senses, respectively. The dynamic disturbance decoupling problem is to find a control scheme such that in the resulting control system the transfer matrix function from the disturbance to the controlled output is zero for all frequencies, i.e. there is no effect of the disturbance on the controlled output. If the disturbance is measurable, the feedforward compensation scheme can be employed to eliminate its effect on the system output, which will be the topic of Section 1 of this chapter. For unmeasurable disturbances which are more often encountered in industry, feedback control has to be adopted. However, there will be inevitably a design tradeoff between the set-point response and disturbance rejection performance. To alleviate this problem, a control scheme, called the disturbance observer, is introduced and it acts as an add-on mechanisms to the conventional feedback system. The disturbance observer estimates the equivalent disturbance as the difference between the actual process output and the output of the nominal model. The estimate is then fed to a process model inverse to produce an extra control effort which can compensate for the disturbance effect on the output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9.3 Notes and References

  • Akashi, H. and H. Imai (1979). Disturbance localization and output deadbeat control through an observer. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 24, 621–627.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andiarti, R. and C. H. Moog (1996). Output feedback disturbance decoupling in nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 41(11), 1683–1689.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, G. and G. Marro (1969). Controlled and conditional invariant subspace in linear system theory. J. Optimiz. Theory and Appli. 3, 306–315.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S.P. (1980). Frequency domain conditions for disturbance rejection. IEEEAC AC-25, 1211–1213.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, S.P. (1982). Transfer function conditions for output feedback disturbance rejection. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control AC-27, 974–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, V (1983). Disturbaance rejection: a polynomial approach. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control AC-28, 508–511.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ohnishi, K. (1987). A new servo method in mechatronics. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Elec. Eng. 107-D, 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernebo, L. (1981). An algebraic theory for the design of controllers for linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Aut. Control AC-26, 171–193.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J.M. (1980). Compensator synthesis using (c,a,b)-pairs. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 25, pp.1133–1138.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Umeno, T. and Y. Hori (1991). Robust speed control of DC servomotors using modern two degrees-of-freedom controller design. IEEE Trans. on Indus. Electronics 38(5), 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems, J.C. and C. Commault (1981). Disturbance decoupling by measurement feedback with stability or pole placement. SIAM J. Control Optim 19, p490–504.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, X. (1996). Parameterization approach to disturbance decoupling problem with stability of nonlinear systems. Automatica 32(4), 607–610.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Yong (2000). Robust identification and disturbance rejection control. PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore. Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2003). Dynamic Disturbance Decoupling. In: Decoupling Control. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 285. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46151-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46151-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44128-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46151-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics