Advertisement

Methodological Approach to Software Quality Assurance through High-Level Object-Oriented Metrics

  • José Romero
  • Oscar Pastor
  • Jorge Belenguer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2425)

Abstract

Traditionally, quality software development has been based on the study of lines of implemented code. Software is usually evaluated by means of metrics coming from programming languages.

On the one hand, regarding the great importance of the early stages of development, metrics must be defined from higher level of abstraction. Consequently, high-level metrics to be defined and validated in this work, come from specification languages.

On the other hand, the concept of quality has subjective aspects leading to numerous proposals for its assurance. Typically, they can be classified in process-centric and product-centric methods. This classification establishes a gap among existing methods. This paper is an attempt to bridge this gap by means of unifying part of the most relevant work about the quality issue, under one umbrella framework. This framework is a methodological approach to software quality assurance based on an object-oriented conceptual modeling method including automatic code generation. It also combines a formal specification language with standard notation.

Due to the particular concepts included in our method, the core of this work is to define and validate a specific set of high-level metrics. They assess the quality of an Information System from the Conceptual Model designed with this method.

The originality of the paper is the way that high-level metrics are obtained. Using practical experiences modeling real systems, the Quality Hypotheses are established. Metrics involved in them are chosen as candidates to be incorporated in the set which is being defined. The final step is to describe the strategy for their formal and empirical validation.

Summing up our methodological approach, software quality assurance consists of: modeling a problem, evaluating the set of metrics, and automatically generating the code of the final software application for a target environment.

In future works, the generalization of these ideas to other object-oriented methods will be studied.

Keywords

Software Quality Software Project Empirical Validation Validation Error Quality Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.R. Basili, L.C. Brian, and W.L. Melo, A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22 (1996), no. 10.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Booch, I. Jacobson, and J. Rumbaugh, OMG Unified Modeling Language specification, June 1999, version 1.3.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.C. Brian, S. Morasca, and V.R. Basili, Property-based software engineering measurement, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22 (1996), no. 1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The SPICE User Group, The software process improvement and capability determination project, October 2001, [online] from World Wide Web http://wwwsel.iit.nrc.ca.
  5. 5.
    ISO, International organization for standardization, online, October 2001, [online] from World Wide Web http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/ISOOnline.frontpage.
  6. 6.
    I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh, The unified software development process, The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series, Addison-Wesley Publishers Corporation, January 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Pastor, F. Hayes, and S. Bear, Oasis:an oo specification language, CAiSE-92Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1250, Springer, 1992, pp. 348.363.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Pastor, E. Insfran, V. Pelechano, J. Romero, and J. Merseguer, OO-METHOD: An OO software production environment combining conventional and formal methods, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 9th International Confer-ence CAiSE’97 (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain), Antoni Olive, Joan Antoni Pastor (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1250, Springer, June 1997, pp. 145–159.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.C. Paulk, C.V. Weber, and B. Curtis, The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process, The SEI Series, Addison-Wesley Publishers Corporation, August 1999, Carnegie Mellon University. Software Engineering Institute.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Romero, J. Merseguer, J. Barberá, and O. Pastor, An automatic software generation tool, SW Engineering Workshop IDEAS’98, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Schuette and T. Rotthowe, The guidelines of modeling-an approach to enhance the quality in information models, International Conference on the Entity Relationship Approach (ER) (Singapore), 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Romero
    • 1
  • Oscar Pastor
    • 1
  • Jorge Belenguer
    • 1
  1. 1.DSICValencia University of TechnologyValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations