Skip to main content

A Generalization of Shostak#x2019;s Method for Combining Decision Procedures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Frontiers of Combining Systems (FroCoS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2309))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Consider the problem of determining whether a quantifier-free formula ϕ is satisfiable in some first-order theory T . Shostak#x2019;s algorithm decides this problem for a certain class of theories with both interpreted and uninterpreted function symbols. We present two new algorithms based on Shostak#x2019;s method. The first is a simple subset of Shostak's algorithm for the same class of theories but without uninterpreted function symbols. This simplified algorithm is easy to understand and prove correct, providing insight into how and why Shostak#x2019;s algorithm works. The simplified algorithm is then used as the foundation for a generalization of Shostak's method based on a variation of the Nelson- Oppen method for combining theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Barrett, D. Dill, and J. Levitt. Validity Checking for Combinations of Theories with Equality. In M. Srivas and A. Camilleri, eds., Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design, volume 1166 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 187–201. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Barrett, D. Dill, and A. Stump. A Framework for Cooperating Decision Procedures. In 17th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark W. Barrett. Checking Validity of Quantifier-Free Formulas in Combinations of First-Order Theories. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nikolaj S. Bjørner. Integrating Decision Procedures for Temporal Verification. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Cyrluk, P. Lincoln, and N. Shankar. On Shostak’s Decision Procedure for Combinations of Theories. In M. McRobbie and J. Slaney, eds., 13th International Conference on Computer Aided Deduction, volume 1104 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 463–477. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z. Manna et al. STeP: Deductive-Algorithmic Verification of Reactive and Realtime Systems. In 8th International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification, volume 1102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 415–418. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeremy R. Levitt. Formal Verification Techniques for Digital Systems. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Nelson and D. Oppen. Simplification by Cooperating Decision Procedures. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1(2):245–57, 1979.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Derek C. Oppen. Complexity, Convexity and Combinations of Theories. Theoretical Computer Science, 12:291–302, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Owre, J. Rushby, and N. Shankar. PVS: A Prototype Verification System. In D. Kapur, ed., 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, volume 607 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 748–752. Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Ruess and N. Shankar. Deconstructing Shostak. In 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pages 19–28, June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert E. Shostak. Deciding Combinations of Theories. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 31(1):1–12, 1984.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Tinelli and M. Harandi. A New Correctness Proof of the Nelson-Oppen Combination Procedure. In F. Baader and K. Schulz, eds., 1st International Workshop on Frontiers of Combining Systems (FroCoS’96), volume 3 of Applied Logic Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ashish Tiwari. Decision Procedures in Automated Deduction. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barrett, C.W., Dill, D.L., Stump, A. (2002). A Generalization of Shostak#x2019;s Method for Combining Decision Procedures. In: Armando, A. (eds) Frontiers of Combining Systems. FroCoS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2309. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45988-X_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45988-X_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43381-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45988-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics