Smoothing and Compression of Lines Obtained by Raster-to-Vector Conversion

  • Eugene Bodansky
  • Alexander Gribov
  • Morakot Pilouk
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2390)

Abstract

This paper presents analyses of different methods of postprocessing lines that have resulted from the raster-to-vector conversion of black and white line drawing. Special attention was paid to the borders of connected components of maps. These methods are implemented with compression and smoothing algorithms. Smoothing algorithms can enhance accuracy, so using both smoothing and compression algorithms in succession gives a more accurate result than using only a compression algorithm. The paper also shows that a map in vector format may require more memory than a map in raster format. The Appendix contains a detailed description of the new smoothing method (continuous local weighted averaging) suggested by the authors.

Keywords

Compression Algorithm Smoothing Method Smoothing Algorithm Raster Image Polygonal Approximation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bodansky, E., Pilouk, M.: Using Local Deviations of Vectorization to Enhance the Performance of Raster-to-Vector Conversion Systems. IJDAR, Vol. 3, #2 (2000) 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quek, F.: An algorithm for the rapid computation of boundaries of run-length encoded regions. Pattern Recognition, 33 (2000) 1637–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ablameyko, S., Pridmore, T.: Machine Interpretation of Line Drawing Images. (Technical Drawings, Maps, and Diagrams.) Springer (2000).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Douglas, D., Peucker, Th.: Algorithm for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. The Canadian Cartographer, Vol. 10, #2 (1973) 112–122.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramer, U.: Extraction of Line Structures from Photographs of Curved Objects. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. Vol. 4 (1975) 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sklansky, J., Gonzalez, V.: Fast Polygonal Approximation of Digitized Curves. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 12 (1980) 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curozumi, Y., Davis, W.: Polygonal approximation by minimax method.” Computer Graphics and Image Processing, Vol. 19 (1982) 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.B. McMaster Automated line generalization. Cartographica, Vol. 24, #2, 1987, pp. 74–111.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.R. White. ”Assessment of line-generalization algorithms using characteristic points.” American Cartographer, Vol. 12, #1, 1985, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Asada, M. Brady. “The curvature primal sketch.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 8, #1, 1986, pp. 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene Bodansky
    • 1
  • Alexander Gribov
    • 1
  • Morakot Pilouk
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc — ESRIRedlandsUSA

Personalised recommendations