Skip to main content

Adapting the UML to Business Modelling’s Needs—Experiences in Situational Method Engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
≪UML≫ 2002 — The Unified Modeling Language (UML 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2460))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In 1999 the Swiss Mobiliar Insurance Company (Mobiliar) started a program to transform to a process oriented organization. Based on reengineered business processes, the refocusing of the information system infrastructure was strived. To ensure a unified methodical procedure during this transformation a competence center was founded. It supports project specific needs by situational method engineering. At inception PROMET BPR and the Unified Modeling Language (UML) were chosen. During the first projects, the requirements for method support changed from being purely process engineered, to a focus of supporting process improvement. This paper characterizes the phases and the specific needs they raise. It shows the evolution and integration of the method fragments. Thereby, the main focus is to describe how the concepts of UML would be linked in particular to ratios of process management in the meta-model of this reengineered method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinkkemper, S.; Saeki, M.; Harmsen, F.: Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering. In: Pernici, B.; Thanos, C. (Eds.): VaiSE’98, LNCS 1413, Springer, Berlin et al., 1998, 381–400

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brinkkemper, S.; Saeki, M.; Harmsen, F.: Meta-Modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering. In: Information Systems 24 (1999) 3, 209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brücher, H.; Endl, R.: Eine geschäftsregelbasierte Erweiterung von UML, in: Proceedings of KnowTech 2001, 01.-03. November 2001, Dresden, Springer, appears in spring 2002

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esswein, W.: Modellierung der Verteilbarkeit von Daten. In: Fortschrittberichte VDI Reihe 10: Informatik/ Kommunikationstechnik, Nr. 251. Düsseldorf: VDIVerlag, 1993, 170–182

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gruhn, V.; Wellen, U.: Process Landscaping—eine Methode zur Geschäftsprozessmodellierung. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 42 (2000) 4, 297–309

    Google Scholar 

  6. o. V.: PROMET rMethodenhandbuch für den Entwurf von Geschäftsprozessen. IMG, St. Gallen, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Junginger, S.; Kühn, H.; Strobl, R.; Karagiannis, D.: Ein Geschäftsprozessmanagement-Werkzeug der nächsten Generation—ADONIS: Konzeption und Anwendung. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 42 (2000) 5, pp. 392–401

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krallmann, H.; Gu, F.; Mitritz, A.: ProVision3D—Eine Virtual RealityWorkbench zur Modellierung, Kontrolle und Steuerung von Geschäftsprozessen im virtuellen Raum. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 41 (1999) 1, pp. 48–57

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kruchten, P.: Der “Rational Unified Process”. In: OBJEKTspektrum, 6 (1999) 1, 38–46

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction. 2nd ed., Addison Wesley, Reading, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  11. Opdahl, A. L.; Sindre, G.: Facet Modelling: An Approach to Flexible Conceptual Modelling. In: Information Systems 22 (1997) 5, pp. 291–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Österle, H.: Business Engineering Prozeβ-und Systementwicklung, Band 1: Entwurfstechniken. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin et al., 1995

    Google Scholar 

  13. o. V.: Rational Unified Process: Best Practices for Software Development Teams. White Paper, Download: http://www.rational.com/media/whitepapers/rupbestpractices.pdf, 07.12.2001

  14. Ter Hofstede, A.H. M.; Verhoef, T. F.: On the Feasibility of Situational Method Engineering. In: Information Systems 22 (1997) 6/7, 401–422

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Versteegen, G.; Salomon, K.; Heinold, R.: Change Management bei Softwareprojekten. Springer, Berlin et al., 2001

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson, H.-E.; Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML: business patterns at work. John Wiley & Sons, New York et al., 2000

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morabito, J.; Sack, I.; Bhate, A.: Organization Modeling: innovative Architectures for the 21st Century. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dietzsch, A. (2002). Adapting the UML to Business Modelling’s Needs—Experiences in Situational Method Engineering. In: Jézéquel, JM., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds) ≪UML≫ 2002 — The Unified Modeling Language. UML 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2460. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45800-X_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45800-X_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44254-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45800-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics