Advertisement

TEMPPLET: A New Method for Domain-Specific Ontology Design

  • Ying Dong
  • Mingshu Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2480)

Abstract

Ontology is becoming a basic and important issue for knowledge management and semantic web applications. However, domain-specific ontology design is always difficult. On one hand, the ontology has to fit into standards in the domain to ensure interoperability; On the other hand, it has to be applied into individual organizations. To solve the problem, in this paper we provide a new method for domain-specific ontology design - “Tempplet”, combining two words “template” and “applet” together. The two steps of the method are: Firstly it follows a “template ontology” of the domain; then fitting “applet ontology” into the chosen template when customizing. Moreover, a formal model is provided to answer whether there exists an applet ontology that both satisfies the constraints and conforms to the template ontology. Two cases of ontology design for different domains are given to illustrate how to apply the method into practice.

Keywords

ontology domain template applet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. [1]
    Fensel, D. (2001). “Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce”: 11. Springer, ISBN: 3-540-41602-1.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chandrasekaran, B. Josephson, J. R. and Benjamins V. R. (1999). “What Are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?” IEEE Intelligent System, Vol. 14, No. 1: 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M. (1996). “Ontologies: Principles, Methods, and Applications”. Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, Mar. 1996: 93–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Grüninger, M.S. and Fox, M. (1995). “Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies”. In Proc. of Int’l Joint Conf. AI Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Fernández, M. Gómez-Pérez, A. and Juriste, N. (1997). “METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art towards Ontological Engineering.” In Proc. of AAAI Spring Symp. Series: 33-40. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, Calif. 1997.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    DAML and its Ontology Library, http://www.daml.org, http://www.daml.org/ontologies/
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Dong, Y. and Li, M. (2002). “ESO: A Prospective Ontology for e-Service”. Paper in submission to 2003 International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT 2003), Orlando, Florida, USA, January 27–31, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Fan, W. and Libkin, L. (2001). “On XML Integrity Constraints in the Presence of DTDs”. In Proc. of 20th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’01). Santa Barbara, California, May 21–24, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ying Dong
    • 1
  • Mingshu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Computer Science Institute of SoftwareChinese Academy of SciencesChina

Personalised recommendations