Abstract
For a Software Process Improvement (SPI) effort to succeed, its participants must have a sense of ownership. One practical technique for achieving that sense of ownership is to apply a meta-process based on the principals of configuration management (CM) to the SPI effort. This paper provides insight into issues of ownership surrounding actual SPI efforts and describes the use of a CM-based meta-process that successfully supported one of these efforts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Humphrey, W.S. (1989). Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.
Osterweil, Leon J. (1997). Software Processes Are Software Too, Revisited. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1997), pp. 540–548. May 17-23, 1997. Boston, MA, USA.
Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Team. (2000). Process Maturity Profile of the Software Community, 2000 Mid-Year Update. Software Engineering Institute.
Sutton, Stanley M., Jr. (2000). The Role of Process in A Software Start-up. IEEE Software July/August 2000 pp. 33–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Green, T.C., Anderson, K.M. (2001). Configuration Management Culture as the Kernel to Success in Software Process Improvement Efforts. In: Ambriola, V. (eds) Software Process Technology. EWSPT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2077. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45752-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45752-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42264-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45752-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive