Advertisement

Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries: Needs and Components

  • Gregory Crane
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2458)

Abstract

This paper describes preliminary conclusions from a long-term study of cultural heritage digital collections. First, those features most important to cultural heritage digital libraries are described. Second, we list those components that have proven most useful in boot-strapping new collections.

Keywords

Cultural Heritage Digital Library Machine Translation Narrative Text Human Language Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, D.A. and G.R. Crane, Disambiguating Geographic Names in a Historical Digital Library. 2001, Perseus Project/Tufts University: Medford, MA. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?doc=2000.06.0012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rydberg-Cox, J.A., A. Mahoney, and G.R. Crane. Document Quality Indicators and Corpus Editions. in JDCL 2001: The First ACM+IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 2001. Roanoke, VA, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crane, G. The Perseus Project and the Problems of Digital Humanities. in Standards und Methoden der Volltextdigitalisierung. 2001. Trier, Germany: Mainz Academy.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crane, G., et al., Drudgery and Deep Thought: Designing Digital Libraries for the Humanities. Communications of the ACM, 2001. 44(5).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crane, G., D.A. Smith, and C. Wulfman. Building a Hypertextual Digital Library in the Humanities: A Case Study on London. in JDCL 2001: The First ACM+IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 2001. Roanoke, VA, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Furuta, R., et al. The Cervantes Project: Steps to a Customizable and Interlinked On-Line Electronic Variorum Edition Supporting Scholarship. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brocks, H., et al. Customizable Retrieval Functions Based on User Tasks in the Cultural Heritage Domain. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chavez, R.F. and T.L. Milbank. London calling: GIS, VR, and the Victorian period. in 7th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. 2001. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniels, M. Is bigger better? web delivery of high-resolution images from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. in Museums and the Web. 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ioannidis, Y., B. Croft, and E. Fox, Digital Libraries in the Future: A Grand Challenge Vision for the 6th Framework Programme. 2001, DELOS: Network of Excellence: Pisa, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crane, G. and J.A. Rydberg-Cox. New Technology and New Roles: The Need for “Corpus Editors”. in The Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. 2000. San Antonio: ACM.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong, J.-S., B.-H. Chen, and J. Hsiang. XSL-based Content Management for Multipresentation Digital Museum Collections. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bergmark, D. and C. Lagoze. An Architecture for Automatic Reference Linking. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahoui, M. and S.J. Cunningham. Search Behavior in a Research-Oriented Digital Library. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hinman, C., The printing and proof-reading of the first folio of Shakespeare. 1963, Oxford,: Clarendon Press. 2 v.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosley, R., R. Knowles, and R. McGugan, Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual of Editorial Practice. 1971, New York: Modern Language Association of America. 143.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pantelia, M., The Thesaurus Linguae Graecae. 2002. http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~tlg/.
  18. 18.
    Martin, T.R., Ancient Greece: from prehistoric to Hellenistic times. 1996, New Haven: Yale University Press. xiii, 252.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liddell, H.G., et al., A Greek-English lexicon. A new rev. and augm. throughout ed. 1940, Oxford,: The Clarendon Press. xlviii, 2111.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andrews, E.A., et al., A Latin dictionary founded on Andrews’ edition of Freund’s Latin dictionary. Rev., enl., and in geat part rewritten. Rev., enl. ed. 1955, Oxford,: Clarendon Press. 1 l.,xiv,2019.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oard, D., Multimodal/Multingual Tools. 2001, DARPA ITO Sponsored Research. http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/psum2001/J293-0.html.
  22. 22.
    Knight, E.H., Knight’s American mechanical dictionary. 1877, New York, Hurd and Houghton, Cambridge [Mass.]: The Riverside press. 3 v.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wheatley, H.B., London Past and Present: Its History, Associations, and Traditions. 1891, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dyer, F.H., A compendium of the war of the rebellion. 1908, Des Moines, Iowa,: The Dyer publishing company. 1796.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hirschman, L., et al. Integrated Feasibility Experiment for Bio-Security: IFE-Bio, A TIDES Demonstration. in HLT2001. 2001. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Association for Machine Translation in the Americas. Conference (4th: 2000: Cuernavaca Mexico) and J.S. White, Envisioning machine translation in the information future: 4th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, AMTA 2000, Cuernavaca, Mexico, October 10-14, 2000: proceedings. 2000, Berlin; New York: Springer. xv, 254.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peters, C., ed. CLEF 2001: Cross-Language System Evaluation Campaign. 2001: Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Radev, D.R., S. Blair-Goldensohn, and Z. Zhang. Interactive, Domain-Independent Identification and Summarization of Topically Related News Articles. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wayne, C.L. Multilingual topic detection and tracking: Successful research enabled by corpora and evaluation. in LREC 2000: 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 2000. Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Voohees, E.M. Overview of the TREC 2001 Question Answering Track. in TREC 2001. 2001. Gaithersburg, MD 20899: NIST.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaslavsky, A., A. Bia, and K. Monostori. Using Copy-Detection and Text Comparison Algorithms for Cross-Referencing Multiple Editions of Literary Works. in European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL 2001). 2001. Darmstadt, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Crane
    • 1
  1. 1.Perseus ProjectTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations