Skip to main content

NExpTime-Complete Description Logics with Concrete Domains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2083))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Concrete domains are an extension of Description Logics (DLs) allowing to integrate reasoning about conceptual knowledge with reasoning about “concrete properties” of objects such as sizes, weights, and durations. It is known that reasoning with ALC(D), the basic DL admitting concrete domains, is PSpace-complete. In this paper, it is shown that the upper bound is not robust: we give three examples for seemingly harmless extensions of ALC(D)—namely acyclic TBoxes, inverse roles, and a role-forming concrete domain constructor—that make reasoning NExpTime-hard. As a corresponding upper bound, we show that reasoning with all three extensions together is in NExpTime.

Acknowledgements

My thanks go to Franz Baader, Ulrike Sattler, and Stephan Tobies for inspiring discussions. The work in this paper was supported by the DFG Project BA1122/3-1 “Combinations of Modal and Description Log- ics”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Baader and P. Hanschke. A scheme for integrating concrete domains into concept languages. In Proc. of IJCAI-91, pp. 452–457, Sydney, Australia, 1991. Morgan Kaufmann Publ., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Baader and P. Hanschke. Extensions of concept languages for a mechanical engineering application. In Proc. of GWAI-92, volume 671 of LNCS, pp. 132–143, Bonn (Germany), 1993. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader and U. Sattler. Description logics with concrete domains and aggregation. In Proc. of ECAI-98, Brighton, August 23-28, 1998. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Börger, E. Grädel, and Y. Gurevich. The Classical Decision Problem. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, and D. Nardi. Reasoning in expressive description logics. In Handbook of Automated Reasoning. Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), Amsterdam, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Donini, M. Lenzerini, D. Nardi, and W. Nutt. The complexity of concept languages. DFKI Research Report RR-95-07, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Kaiserslautern, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Haarslev, C. Lutz, and R. Möller. Defined topological relations in description logics. In Proc. of KR’98, pp. 112–124, Trento, Italy, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann Publ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Haarslev, C. Lutz, and R. Möller. A description logic with concrete domains and role-forming predicates. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(3), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. E. Hopcroft and J. D. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Horrocks and U. Sattler. A description logic with transitive and inverse roles and role hierarchies. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(3):385–410, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Horrocks, U. Sattler, and S. Tobies. Practical reasoning for expressive description logics. In Proc. of LPAR’99, number 1705 in LNAI, pp. 161–180. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Kamp and H. Wache. CTL-a description logic with expressive concrete domains. Technical Report LKI-M-96/01, Labor für Künstliche Intelligenz, Universität Hamburg, Germany, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Lutz. Complexity of terminological reasoning revisited. In Proc. of LPAR’99, number 1705 in LNAI, pp. 181–200. Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Lutz. Reasoning with concrete domains. In Proc. of IJCAI-99, pp. 90–95, Stockholm, Sweden, July 31-August 6, 1999. Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Lutz. Interval-based temporal reasoning with general TBoxes. In Proc. of IJCAI-01, Seattle, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Lutz. NExpTime-complete description logics with concrete domains. LTCS-Report 00-01, LuFG Theoretical Computer Science, RWTH Aachen, Germany, 2000. See http://www-lti.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/Reports.html.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. E. M. Post. A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 52:264–268, 1946.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lutz, C. (2001). NExpTime-Complete Description Logics with Concrete Domains. In: Goré, R., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2083. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45744-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45744-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42254-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45744-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics