Skip to main content

Multiagent SAT (MASSAT): Autonomous Pattern Search in Constrained Domains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning — IDEAL 2002 (IDEAL 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2412))

Abstract

In this paper, we present an autonomous pattern search approach to solving Satisfiability Problems (SATs). Our approach is essentially a multiagent system. To solve a SAT problem, we first divide variables into groups, and represent each variable group with an agent. Then, we randomly place each agent onto a position in the correspoding local space which is composed of the domains of the variables that are represented by this agent. Thereafter, all agents will autonomously make search decisions guided by some reactive rules in their local spaces until a special pattern (i.e., solution) is found or a time step threshold is reached. Experimental results on some benchmark SAT test-sets have shown that by employing the MASSAT approach, we can obtain performances comparable to those of other popular algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. J. Bayardo Jr. and R. C. Schrag, Using CSP Look-back Techniques to Solve Real-world SAT Instances, in Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 203–208, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Crawford and L. D. Auton, Experimental Results on the Crossover Point in Random 3SAT, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 81, No. 1-2, pp. 31–57, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S.A. Cook, The Complexity of theorem proving procedures, in Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computation, pp. 151–158, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Gu, Efficient local search for very large-scale satisfiability problem, SIGART Bulletin, vol. 3, pp. 8–12, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. A. Hirsch and A. Kojevnikov, UnitWalk: A new SAT solver that uses local search guided by unit clause elimination, in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2002), pp. 35–42, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. H. Hoos, On the run-time behavior of stochastic local search algorithms for SAT, in Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI’99, pp. 661–666, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. M. Li and Anbulagan, Look-ahead Versus Look-back for Satisfiability Problems, in Proceedings of CP’97, pp. 341–345, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Liu, Autonomous Agents And Multi-Agent Systems: Explorations in Learning, Self-Organization and Adaptive Computation, World Scientific, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Liu, H. Jing and Y. Y. Tang, Multi-agent oriented constraint satisfaction Artificial Intelligence, vol. 136, pp. 101–144, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J. P. Marques-Silva and K. A. Sakallah, GRASP-A New Search Algorithm for Satisfiability, in Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Mazure, L. Sais, and É. Grégoire, Tabu Search for SAT, in Proceedings of AAAI’97, pp. 281–285, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. McAllester, B. Selman, and H. Levesque, Evidence for Invariants in Local Search, in Proceedings of AAAI’97, pp. 321–326, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Schuurmans and F. Southey, Local search characteristics of incomplete SAT procedures, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 121–150, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Selman, H. A. Kautz, and B. Cohen, Noise Strategies for Improving Local Search, in Proceedings of AAAI’94, pp. 337–343, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Selman, H. Levesque, and D. Mitchell, A New Method for Solving Hard Satisfiability Problems, in Proceedings of AAAI’92, pp. 440–446, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.intellektik.informatick.tu-darmstadt.de/SATLIB/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jin, X., Liu, J. (2002). Multiagent SAT (MASSAT): Autonomous Pattern Search in Constrained Domains. In: Yin, H., Allinson, N., Freeman, R., Keane, J., Hubbard, S. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning — IDEAL 2002. IDEAL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2412. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45675-9_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45675-9_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44025-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45675-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics