Skip to main content

Complexity of Linear Standard Theories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2250))

  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

We give an algorithm for deciding E-unification problems for linear standard equational theories (linear equations with all shared variables at a depth less than two) and varity 1 goals (linear equations with no shared variables). We show that the algorithm halts in quadratic time for the non-uniform E-unification problem, and linear time if the equational theory is varity 1. The algorithm is still polynomial for the uniform problem. The size of the complete set of unifiers is exponential, but membership in that set can be determined in polynomial time. For any goal (not just varity 1) we give a NEXPTIME algorithm.

This work was supported by NSF grant number CCR-9712388 and ONR grant number N00014-01-1-0435..

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Baader and T. Nipkow. Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Basin and H. Ganzinger. Automated complexity analysis based on ordered resolution. In J. Association for Computing Machinery 48(1), 70–109, 2001.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Comon. Sequentiality, second order monadic logic and tree automata. In Proceedings 10th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS’95, IEEE Computer Society Press, 508–517,1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Comon, M. Haberstrau and J.-P. Jouannaud. Syntacticness, Cycle Syntacticness and shallow theories. In Information and Computation 111(1), 154–191, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Dowling and J. Gallier. Linear-time algorithms for testing the satisfiability of propositional horn formulae. In Journal of Logic Programming 3, 267–284, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Gallier and W. Snyder. Complete sets of transformations for general Eunification. In TCS, vol. 67, 203–260, 1989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Ganzinger. Relating Semantic and Proof-Theoretic Concepts for Polynomial Time Decidability of Uniform Word Problems. In Proceedings 16th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS’ 2001, Boston, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Jacquemard. Decidable approximations of term rewriting systems. In H. Ganzinger, ed., Rewriting Techniques and Applications, 7th International Conference, RTA-96, Vol. 1103 of LNCS, Springer, 362–376, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Jacquemard, Ch. Meyer, Ch. Weidenbach. Unification in Extensions of Shallow Equational Theories. In T. Nipkow, ed., Rewriting Techniques and Applications,9th International Conference, RTA-98, Vol. 1379, LNCS, Springer, 76–90, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Kirchner. Computing unification algorithms. In Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Boston, 200–216, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Kozen. Complexity of finitely presented algebras. In Proc. 9th STOC, 164–177,1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Kozen. Positive first order logic is NP-complete. IBM Journal of Res. Developp., 25(4):327–332, July 1981.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Lynch and B. Morawska. Complexity of Linear Standard Theories.http://www.clarkson.edu/~clynch/papers/standard_full.ps/, 2001.

  14. C. Lynch and B. Morawska. Decidability and Complexity of Finitely Closable Linear Equational Theories. In R. Goré, A. Leitsch and T. Nipkow, eds., Automated Reasoning. First International Joint Conference, IJCAR 2001, Vol. 2083 of LNAI,499–513, Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Lynch and B. Morawska. Goal Directed E-Unification. In RTA 12,. A. Middeldorp, LNCS vol. 2051, 231–245, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. McAllester. Automated Recognition of Tractability in Inference Relations. In Journal of the ACM, vol.40(2), pp. 284–303, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Middeldorp, S. Okui, T. Ida. Lazy Narrwing: Strong Completeness and Eager Variable Elimination. In Theoretical Computer Science 167(1,2), pp. 95–130, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Nieuwenhuis. Basic paramodulation and decidable theories. (Extended abstract),In Proceedings 11th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science,LICS’96, IEEE Computer Society Press, 473–482, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lynch, 1., Morawska, B. (2001). Complexity of Linear Standard Theories. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2250. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45653-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45653-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42957-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45653-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics