Skip to main content
Book cover

International Conference on Discovery Science

DS 2001: Discovery Science pp 74–86Cite as

Spherical Horses and Shared Toothbrushes: Lessons Learned from a Workshop on Scientific and Technological Thinking

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNAI,volume 2226)

Abstract

We briefly summarize some of the lessons learned in a workshop on cognitive studies of science and technology. Our purpose was to assemble a diverse group of practitioners to discuss the latest research, identify the stumbling blocks to advancement in this field, and brainstorm about directions for the future. Two questions became central themes. First, how can we combine artificial studies involving ‘spherical horses’ with fine-grained case studies of actual practice? Results obtained in the laboratory may have low applicability to real world situations. Second, how can we deal with academics’ attachments to their theoretical frameworks? Academics often like to develop unique ‘toothbrushes’ and are reluctant to use anyone else’s. The workshop illustrated that toothbrushes can be shared and that spherical horses and fine-grained case studies can complement one another. Theories need to deal rigorously with the distributed character of scientific and technological problem solving. We hope this workshop will suggest directions more sophisticated theories might take.

Keywords

  • Conceptual Change
  • Tacit Knowledge
  • Implicit Learning
  • Cognitive Study
  • Artificial Study

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45650-3_10
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-540-45650-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christensen, C.M., The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. 1997, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, P. and T.S. Wurster, Blown to bits: How the new economics of information transforms strategy. 2000, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. 1995, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorman, M.E., et al., Alexander Graham Bell, Elisha Gray and the Speaking Telegraph: A Cognitive Comparison. History of Technology, 1993. 15: p. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shrager, J. and P. Langley, Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. 1990, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simon, H.A., Langley, P. W., & Bradshaw, G., Scientific discovery as problem solving. Synthese, 1981. 47: p. 1–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Slezak, P., Scientific discovery by computer as empirical refutation of the Strong Programme. Social Studies of Science, 1989. 19(4): p. 563–600.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zykow, J. M. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. 1987, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradshaw, G.L., Langley, P., & Simon, H. A., Studying scientific discovery by computer simulation. Science, 1983. 222: p. 971–975.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Vera, A.H. and H.A. Simon, Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 1993. 17(1): p. 7–48.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greeno, J.G. and J.L. Moore, Situativity and symbols: Response to Vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 1993. 17: p. 49–59.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild. 1995, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, D.A., Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. 1993, New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Donald, M., Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. 1991, Cambridge, UK: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nersessian, N., How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science, in Cognitive Models of Science, R.N. Giere, Editor. 1992, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis. p. 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suchman, L.A., Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. 1987, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klahr, D., Exploring Science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. 2000, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klahr, D. and H.A. Simon, Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 1999. 125(5): p. 524–543.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorman, M.E., Simulating Science: Heuristics, Mental Models and Technoscientific Thinking. Science, Technology and Society, ed. T. Gieryn. 1992, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dunbar, K., How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories, in The nature of insight, R.J. Sternberg and J. Davidson, Editors. 1995, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 365–396.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dunbar, K., How scientists think, in Creative Thought, T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and J. Vaid, Editors. 1997, American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dunbar, K. Scientific reasoning strategies in a simulated molecular genetics environment. in Program of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1989. Ann Arbor, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shrager, J., Commonsense perception and the psychology of theory formation, in Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation, J. Shrager, & Langley, P., Editor. 1990, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.: San Mateo, CA. p. 437–470.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gooding, D.C. and T.R. Addis, Modelling Faraday’s experiments with visual functional programming 1: Models, methods and examples,. 1993, Joint Research Councils’ Initiative on Cognitive Science & Human Computer Interaction Special Project Grant #9107137.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gorman, M. and R. Rosenwein, Simulating social epistemology. Social Epistemology, 1995. 9(1): p. 71–79.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Gruber, H., Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. 2nd ed. 1981, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gorman, M.E. and J.K. Robinson, Using History to Teach Invention and Design: The Case of the Telephone. Science and Education, 1998. 7: p. 173–201.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Simina, M., Enterprise-directed reasoning: Opportunism and deliberation in creative reasoning, in Cognitive Science. 1999, Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gorman, M.E., Transforming nature: Ethics, invention and design. 1998, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bradshaw, G., The Airplane and the Logic of Invention, in Cognitive Models of Science, R.N. Giere, Editor. 1992, University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis. p. 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hickam, H.H., Rocket boys: A memoir. 1998, New York: Delacorte Press. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gordon (producer), C. and J. Johnston (director), October Sky,. 1999, Universal Studios: Universal City, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tweney, R.D., Scientific Thinking: A cognitive-historical approach, in Designing for Science: Implications for everyday, classroom, and professional settings, K. Crowley, C.D. Schunn, and T. Okada, Editors. 2001, Lawrence Earlbaum & Associates: Mawah, NJ. p. 141–173.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Galison, P.L., Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. 1997, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hughes, T.P., Rescuing Prometheus. 1998, New York: Pantheon books.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Collins, H.M., Tacit knowledge and scientific networks, in Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science, B. Barnes and D. Edge, Editors. 1982, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mackenzie, D. and G. Spinardi, Tacit knowledge, weapons design, and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology, 1995. 101(1): p. 44–99.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Berry, D.C., ed. How implicit is implicit learning?. 1997, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dienes, Z. and J. Perner, A Theory of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1999. 22(5).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matthews, R.C. and L.G. Roussel, Abstractness of implicit knowledge: A cognitive evolutionary perspective, in How implicit is implicit learning?, D.C. Berry, Editor. 1997, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 13–47.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Karmiloff-Smith, A., From meta-process to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 1986. 23(2): p. 95–147.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technology, Culture & Communications, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400744, 22904-4744, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Michael E. Gorman & Matthew M. Mehalik

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400400, 22904-4400, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Alexandra Kincannon

Authors
  1. Michael E. Gorman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexandra Kincannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew M. Mehalik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DFKI GmbH Saarbrücken, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Klaus P. Jantke

  2. Department of Informatics, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, 812-8581, Fukuoka, Japan

    Ayumi Shinohara

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gorman, M.E., Kincannon, A., Mehalik, M.M. (2001). Spherical Horses and Shared Toothbrushes: Lessons Learned from a Workshop on Scientific and Technological Thinking. In: Jantke, K.P., Shinohara, A. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2226. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45650-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45650-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42956-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45650-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive