Skip to main content

On stalling in LogP

(Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel and Distributed Processing (IPDPS 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1800))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate the issue of stalling in the LogP model. In particular, we introduce a novel quantitative characterization of stalling, referred to as δ-stalling, which intuitively captures the realistic assumption that once the network’s capacity constraint is violated, it takes some time (at most δ) for this information to propagate to the processors involved. We prove a lower bound that shows that LogP under δ-stalling is strictly more powerful than the stall-free version of the model where only strictly stall-free computations are permitted. On the other hand, we show that δ-stalling LogP with δ = L can be simulated with at most logarithmic slowdown by a BSP machine with similar bandwidth and latency values, thus extending the equivalence (up to logarithmic factors) between stall-free LogP and BSP argued in [1] to the more powerful L-stalling LogP.

This research was supported, in part, by the Italian CNR, and by MURST under Project Algorithms for Large Data Sets: Science and Engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Bilardi, K.T. Herley, A. Pietracaprina, G. Pucci and P. Spirakis. BSP vs. LogP. Algorithmica, 24:405–422, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D.E. Culler, R. Karp, D. Patterson, A. Sahay, K.E. Schauser, E. Santos, R. Subramonian, and T.V. Eicken. LogP: A practical model of parallel computation. Communications of the ACM, 39(11):78–85, November 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.T. Goodrich. Communication-Efficient Parallel Sorting. In Proc. of the 28th ACM Symp on Theory of Computing, pages 247–256, Philadelphia PA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.D. MacKenzie. Lower bounds for randomized exclusive write PRAMs. Theorey of Computing Systems, 30(6):599–626, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Ramachandran, B. Grayson, and M. Dahlin. Emulations between QSM, BSP and LogP: a framework for general-purpose parallel algorithm design. TR98-22, Dept. of CS, Univ. of Texas at Austin, November 1998. (Summary in Proc. of ACM-SIAM SODA, 1999.)

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.G. Valiant. A bridging model for parallel computation. Communications of the ACM, 33(8):103–111, August 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bilardi, G., Herley, K.T., Pietracaprina, A., Pucci, G. (2000). On stalling in LogP. In: Rolim, J. (eds) Parallel and Distributed Processing. IPDPS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1800. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45591-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45591-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67442-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45591-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics