A Negotiation Model to Support Material Selection in Concurrent Design
Based upon empirical studies, this paper describes a negotiation model to support materials selection by design teams using concurrent design methodologies. The model is realised in a tool that supports designers in this task. Given a list of materials currently proposed, similar alternatives are offered to individual designers based upon both shared and private representations. Fuzzy measures of similarity are used to identify possible counter proposals. A fuzzy measure of value is used to rank these. Conventional negotiation protocols from economics or game theory did not correspond well to the negotiation behaviour of designers. Currently, the human user remains responsible for the communication of any proposal he or she wishes to make, and for the supporting argumentation.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Landauer, T. K.; The trouble with computers. Academic Press, Cambridge Ma. (1995)Google Scholar
- 2.Smithers, T.; On knowledge level theories of the design process. in Artificial Intelligence in Design. Gero, J. S., Sudweeks, F. (eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers. (1996) 561–579.Google Scholar
- 3.Huns, M. N. and Stephens, L. M.; Multiagent Systems and Societies of Agents in Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Weiss, G. (ed.), MIT Press. (1999) 79–120Google Scholar
- 5.Barker, R., Holloway, L., Mardell, J. and Meehan, A.; Supporting Knowledge-based processes using flexible intelligent agents. AAAI Spring Symposium 2000, Stanford, Ca., USA (2000).Google Scholar
- 6.Bernaras, A. and Van de Velde, W.; Design. in Breuker, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) CommonKADS library for expertise modelling: reusable problem solving components. IOS Press, (1995) Chapter 8.Google Scholar
- 8.Barker, R., Tranter, I. and Meehan, A.; Towards a knowledge-level model of concurrent design. In IEA-AIE’98, Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Engineering Applications of AI and Expert Systems, Mira, J, del Pobil, A. P., Moonis Ali (eds), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1415; Springer-Verlag, (1998) 57–67.Google Scholar
- 9.de Hoog, R., Martil, R., Wielinga, B. et al.; The CommonKADS Model Set, ESPRIT Project P5248: Document Id. KADS-II/WP I-II/RR/UvA/018/4.0, University of Amsterdam (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Barker, R. and Meehan, A.; Supporting Concurrent Design Teams with Adjustably Autonomous Agents, AAAI Spring Symposium 1999, Stanford, Ca., USA (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Holloway, L.; A methodology and support tool for environmentally conscious design and manufacture. PhD Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK. (1997)Google Scholar
- 12.Holloway, L.; Materials selection for optimal environmental impact in mechanical design. Materials & Design 19; Elsevier Science Ltd. (1998) 133–143Google Scholar
- 14.Sycara, K., Lewis, C.; Modelling group decision making and negotiation in concurrent product design. International Journal of Systems Automation 1:217–238.Google Scholar
- 17.Zlotkin, G., Rosenschein, J. S.; Mechanisms for automated negotiation in state oriented domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 5 (1996) 163–238.Google Scholar
- 21.Sierra, C., Faratin, P. and Jennings, N. R.; Deliberative Automated Negotiators Using Fuzzy Similarities. Proc EUSFLAT-ESTYLF Joint Conference on Fuzzy Logic, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, (1997) 155–158Google Scholar