Skip to main content

Conceptual Graph Matching for Semantic Search

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces (ICCS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2393))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantic search becomes a research hotspot. The combined use of linguistic ontologies and structured semantic matching is one of the promising ways to improve both recall and precision. In this paper, we propose an approach for semantic search by matching conceptual graphs. The detailed definitions of semantic similarities between concepts, relations and conceptual graphs are given. According to these definitions of semantic similarity, we propose our conceptual graph matching algorithm that calculates the semantic similarity. The computation complexity of this algorithm is constrained to be polynomial. A prototype of our approach is currently under development with IBM China Research Lab.

This work is supported by IBM China Research Laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd.: The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford University, 1998. Available at http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/pageranksub.ps

  2. Lum et.al.: An architecture for a multimedia DBMS supporting content search. In the Proceedings of International Conference on Computing and Information (ICCI’90), LNCS Vol.468, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Guarino, C. Masolo, and G. Vetere.: OntoSeek: Content-Based Access to the Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(3), pp.70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. A. Aslandogan, C. Thier, C. T. Yu, C. Liu, and K. R. Nair.: Design, implementation and evaluation of SCORE (a System for COntent based REtrieval of pictures). In Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering, pages 280–287, Taipei, Taiwan, March 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. F. Sowa.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine, Addison-Wesley. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lei Zhang and Yong Yu.: Learning to Generate CGs from Domain Specific Sentences. In proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, (ICCS2001), LNAI Vol.2120, Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jonathan Poole and J. A. Campbell.: A Novel Algorithm for Matching Conceptual and Related Graphs. In G. Ellis et al eds, Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory, pp. 293–307, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. Springer-Verlag, LNAI 954, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. George A. Miller.: WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database. In the International Journal of Lexicography, Vol.3, No.4, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John F. Sowa.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, Brooks Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Kushmerick, Daniel S. Weld and Robert B. Doorenbos.: Wrapper Induction for Information Extraction. Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence pp.729–737

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jianming Li, Lei Zhang and Yong Yu.: Learning to Generate Semantic Annotation for Domain Specific Sentences. In the Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation, the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2001), Victoria B.C., Canada, Oct.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.H. Cormen, C.E.Leiserson and RX.Rivest: Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Daelemans, S. Buchholz, and J. Veenstra.: Memory-Based Shallow Parsing. In Proceedings of EMNLP/VLC-99, pages 239–246, University of Maryland, USA, June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norman Foo, B. Garner, E. Tsui and A. Rao.: Semantic Distance in Conceptual Graphs. In J. Nagle and T. Nagle, editors, Fourth Annual Workshop on Conceptual Structures, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Ralescu and A. Fadlalla.: The issue of semantic distance in knowledge representation with conceptual graphs. In Proceedings of Fifth Annual Workshop on Conceptual Structures, pages 141–142, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Richardson, A. F. Smeaton and J. Murphy.: Using WordNet as a Knowledge Base for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words. In the Proceedings of AICS Conference, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhong, J., Zhu, H., Li, J., Yu, Y. (2002). Conceptual Graph Matching for Semantic Search. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D., Angelova, G. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43901-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45483-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics