Skip to main content

The CG Formalism as an Ontolingua for Web-Oriented Representation Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2393))

Abstract

The semantic Web entails the standardization of representation mechanisms so that the knowledge contained in a Web document can be retrieved and processed on a semantic level. RDF seems to be the emerging encoding scheme for that purpose. However, there are many different sorts of documents on the Web that do not use RDF as their primary coding scheme. It is expected that many one-to-one mappings between pairs of document representation formalisms will eventually arise. This would create a situation where a young standard such as RDF would generate update problems for all these mappings as it evolves, which is inevitable. Rather, we advocate the use of a common Ontolingua for all these encoding formalisms. Though there may be many knowledge representation formalisms suited for that task, we advocate the use of the conceptual graph formalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Atkinson and T. Kühne. The Essence of Multilevel Metamodeling. In Proceedings of UML’2001 Conference on Modeling Languages, Concepts and Tools, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 1–5 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Berners-Lee. Conceptual Graphs and the Semantic Web. February 2001. available at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CG.html.

  3. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. X. Blanc, J. F. Perrot, and N. Reveault. Traduction de méta-modèles. In I. Borne and R. Godin, editors, Langages et Modéles à Objets, pages 95–111, Le Croisic, France, Janvier 2001. Hermès Science Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Bézivin. Objects Everywhere. In Proceedings of ICEIS, Setùbal, Portugal, July 2001. Invited Presentation.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Bézivin and O. Gerbé. Towards a Precise Definition of the OMG/MDA Frame-Work. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pages 273–280, San Diego, USA, November 2001. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Chen. The Entity-Relationship Model: Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(1):9–36, March 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Wide Web Consortium. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Crawley, S. Davis, J. Indulska, S. McBride, and K. Raymond. Meta-Meta is Better-Better. October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Delteil, R. Dieng, and C. Faron-Zucker. Extension of RDFS Based on the CGs Formalism. In H. Delugach and G. Stumme, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2001, pages 275–289, Stanford, CA, USA, July/August 2001. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Delugach and G. Stumme, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2001. Springer Verlag, Stanford, CA, USA, July/August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Eklund and P. Martin. Embedding Knowledge in Web Documents: CGs versus XML-based Metadata Languages. In W. Cyre and W. Tepfenhart, editors, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 1999, pages 230–246, Blacksburg, VA, USA, July 1999. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Esch. Contexts, Canons and Coreferent Types. In J. Dick, J. Sowa, and W. Tepfenhart, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS, pages 185–195, College Park, Maryland, USA, August 1994. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Ganter and G. Mineau, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000. Springer Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany, August 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O. Gerbé. Conceptual Graphs for Corporate Knowledge Repositories. In H. Delugach, M. Keeler, D. Lukose, L. Searle, and J. Sowa, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS, pages 474–488, Seattle, Washington, USA, August 1997. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. Gerbé. Un modèle uniforme pour la modélisation et la métamodélisation d”une mémoire d”entreprise. PhD thesis, Université de Montréal, Avril 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Gerbé and B. Kerhervé. Modeling and Metamodeling Requirements for Knowledge Management. In J. Bézivin, J. Ernst, and W. Pidcock, editors, Proceedings of OOPSLA Workshop on Model Engineering with CDIF, Vancouver, Canada, October 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, September 1997. OMG Document AD/97-08-14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language Specification, Jume 1999. OMG Document AD/99-06-08.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Kocura. Semantics of Attribute Relations in Conceptual Graphs. In B. Ganter and G. Mineau, editors, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, pages 235–248, Darmstadt, Germany, August 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Lemesle. Transformation Rules Based on Metamodeling. In Proceedings of Second International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOC, pages 113–122, La Jolla, CA, November 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Sahraoui. Application de la méta-modélisation à la génération des outils de conception et de mise en oeuvre des bases de données. PhD thesis, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Sowa. Relating diagrams to logic. In John F. Sowa Guy W. Mineau, Bernard Moulin, editor, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Conceptual Graphs (ICCS’93), volume 699, pages 1–35, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, August 1993. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Sowa. Ontology, Matadata, and Semiotics. In B. Ganter and G. Mineau, editors, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, pages 55–81, Darmstadt, Germany, August 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W3C. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, February 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Wermelinguer. Conceptual Graphs and First Order Logic. In G. Ellis, R. Levin-son, and W. Rich, editors, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Conceptual Structures, pages 323–337, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, August 1995. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerbé, O., Mineau, G.W. (2002). The CG Formalism as an Ontolingua for Web-Oriented Representation Languages. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D., Angelova, G. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces. ICCS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45483-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43901-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45483-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics