Adaptive and Reflective Middleware for Distributed Real-Time and Embedded Systems

  • Douglas C. Schmidt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2211)


Software has become strategic to developing effective distributed real-time and embedded (DRE) systems. Next-generation DRE systems, such as total ship computing environments, coordinated unmanned air vehicle systems, and national missile defense, will use many geographically dispersed sensors, provide on-demand situational awareness and actuation capabilities for human operators, and respond flexibly to unanticipated run-time conditions. These DRE systems will also increasingly run unobtrusively and autonomously, shielding operators from unnecessary details, while communicating and responding to mission-critical information at an accelerated operational tempo. In such environments, it’s hard to predict system configurations or workloads in advance. This paper describes the need for adaptive and reflective middleware systems (ARMS) to bridge the gap between application programs and the underlying operating systems and network protocol stacks in order to provide reusable services whose qualities are critical to DRE systems. ARMS middleware can adapt in response to dynamically changing conditions for the purpose of utilizing the available computer and network infrastructure to the highest degree possible in support of mission needs.


Object Management Group Common Object Request Broker Architecture Operating System Platform CORBA Component Model Mission Computing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Bla99]
    Blair, G. S., F. Costa, G. Coulson, H. Duran, et al, “The Design of a Resource-Aware Reflective Middleware Architecture”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Meta-Level Architectures and Reflection, St.-Malo, France, Springer-Verlag, LNCS, Vol. 1616, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Bol00]
    Bollella, G., Gosling, J. “The Real-Time Specification for Java,” Computer, June 2000.Google Scholar
  3. [DARPA99]
    DARPA, The Quorum Program,, 1999.
  4. [Gam95]
    Gamma E., Helm R., Johnson R., Vlissides J., Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [John97]
    Johnson R., “Frameworks = Patterns + Components”, Communications of the ACM, Volume 40, Number 10, October, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. [Loy01]
    Loyall J. L., Gossett J. M., Gill C. D., Schantz R. E., Zinky J. A., Pal P, Shapiro R, Rodrigues C, Atighetchi M, Karr D. “Comparing and Contrasting Adaptive Middleware Support in Wide-Area and Embedded Distributed Object Applications”. Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS-21), April 16–19, 2001, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
  7. [Omg98a]
    Object Management Group, “Fault Tolerance CORBA Using Entity Redundancy RFP”, OMG Docu-ment orbos/98-04-01 edition, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. [Omg98b]
    Object Management Group, “CORBAServcies: Common Object Service Specification,” OMG Technical Document formal/98-12-31.Google Scholar
  9. [Omg99]
    Object Management Group, “CORBA Compon-ent Model Joint Revised Submission,” OMG Document orbos/99-07-01.Google Scholar
  10. [Omg00]
    Object Management Group, “The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Revision 2.4, OMG Technical Document formal/00-11-07”, October 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [Sch86]
    Schantz, R., Thomas R., Bono G., “The Architecture of the Cronus Distributed Operating System”, Pro-ceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS-6), Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 1986.Google Scholar
  12. [Sch98]
    Schmidt D., Levine D., Mungee S. “The Design and Performance of the TAO Real-Time Object Request Broker”, Computer Communications Special Issue on Building Quality of Service into Distributed Systems, 21(4), 1998.Google Scholar
  13. [Sch00a]
    Schmidt D., Kuhns F., “An Overview of the Real-time CORBA Specification,” IEEE Computer Magazine, June, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. [Sch00b]
    Schmidt D., Stal M., Rohnert H., Buschmann F., Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: Patterns for Concurrent and Networked Objects, Wiley and Sons, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. [Sch01]
    Schmidt D., Huston S., C++ Network Programming: Resolving Complexity with ACE and Patterns, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. [Sch01a]
    Schantz R., Schmidt D., “Middleware for Distributed Systems: Evolving the Common Structure for Network-centric Applications,” Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, Wiley & Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. [Sha98]
    Sharp, David C., “Reducing Avionics Software Cost Through Component Based Product Line Development”, Software Technology Conference, April 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas C. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept.University of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations