Programming Agent with Purposes: Application to Autonomous Shooting in Virtual Environment

  • Pierre-Alexandre Favier
  • Pierre De Loor
  • Jacques Tisseau
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2197)

Abstract

This paper proposes an architecture for defining and executing agents’ behaviour from purposes. This architecture is used for the definition of an autonomous camera which makes automatic shooting of a virtual reality scene in real time. The user or others agents program the camera in a declarative and qualitative way. Multiples purposes can be specified. In case of contradictory purposes, the camera finds a compromise or, if not possible, leave some purposes. Multiple agents programmed by purposes generate complex and credible animations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    David B. Christianson et al. Declarative Camera Control for Automatic Cinematography. AAAI/IAAI, (1): 148-23,1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Bryson. Cross-paradigm analysis of autonomous agent architecture. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 12, pages 165–189, 2000.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Donikian. Towards scenario for semi-autonomous entities. International Conference on Visual Computing, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Ferber. Multi-agent systems-an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Addison Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Harrouet. oris: s’immerger par le langage pour le prototypage d’univers virtuels à base d’entités autonomes, thèse de doctorat. UBO, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Hayes-Roth. An architecture for adaptative intelligent systems. Artificial Intelligence: Special Issue on Agents and Interactivity, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Ingrand, M. Georgeff, and A. Rao. An architecture for real-time reasoning and system control. IEEE Expert, pages 34–44, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Maes. The dynamics of action selection. In Proceedings of IJCAI-89, volume 2, pages 991–998, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Mateas. An oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents. Technical report, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Perlin and A. Goldberg. Improv: A system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH’96, pages 205–216, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Chevaillier R. Querrec and P. Reignier. Humans and autonomous agents interactions in a virtual environment for fire fighting training. Proc. of Laval Virtual, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Reignier, F. Harrouet, S. Morvan, J. Tisseau, and T. Duval. Arévi: a virtual reality multiagent platform. Proceedings VW’98, pages 229–240, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michael Wooldridge. Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre-Alexandre Favier
    • 1
  • Pierre De Loor
    • 1
  • Jacques Tisseau
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Informatique IndustrielleEcole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de BrestBrest CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations