Skip to main content

Safety Functions versus Control Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability and Security (SAFECOMP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2187))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is argued that there need not be any conflict between “Control Functions” and “Safety Functions” as long as “Functionality” and “Safety” are integral parts of the design process and considered on an equal basis at the earliest stage possible in the development. A practical example is given to illustrate this viewpoint. The need to expand and complement the customary set of notions and methodologies is motivated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fankhauser, H. R. (2000). Safety versus Availability. In Proc. 4th IREE 2000, Technological Advancement in Rolling Stock, pp 103–118, Confederation of Indian Industry, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IEC 61508-4 (1998) Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic systems, Part 4: Definitions and abbreviations, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  3. IEC 61508-1 (1998) Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic systems, Part 1: General requirements, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fankhauser, H. R. (1999). Hazard trees: A complement to event trees and fault trees for safety analysis. In Safety and Reliability, pp. 1343–1348, Schuëller & Kafka (eds) Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henley, E. J. & Kumamoto, H. (1992). Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Reliability Engineering, Design and Analysis, IEEE Press, New York, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fankhauser, H.R. (2001). Safety Functions versus Control Functions. In: Voges, U. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability and Security. SAFECOMP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45416-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45416-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42607-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45416-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics