Advertisement

Effects of Cognitive and Problem Solving Style on Internet Search Tool

  • Tek Yong Lim
  • Enya Kong Tang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1923)

Abstract

This paper presents a research proposal on user-oriented evaluation method to compare the usability of Internet search tools. Cognitive style and problem solving style are identified individual difference factors. Meta-search, portal and individual search engines are Internet search tool available. Usability of each search tools based on relevancy and satisfaction is another factor of this study. The ultimate aim of the research is to contribute to the knowledge concerning individual differences and information retrieval technology. In particular we hope to get a better understanding of which presentation structures and user interface attributes work best and why.

Keywords

Information Retrieval Cognitive Style Search Tool Information Retrieval System Result Page 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, A.L.: Datastar Web: A Comparison with “Classic” Datastar Command Language Searching. Online & Cdrom Review, (1998) 223Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chu, H.T., Rosenthal, M.: Search Engines for the World Wide Web: A Comparative Study and evaluation methodology. Proceeding of the American Society for Information Science (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Courtois, M. P., Baer, W. M., Stark, M.: Cool Tools for Searching the Web, Online, (1995)196Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desmarais, N.: The Librarian’s Cd-Rom Handbook, Meckler Publishing, London (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ding, W., Marchionni, G.: A Comparative Study of Web Search Service performance, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ford, N., Wood, F., Walsh, C.: Cognitive Styles and Searching. Online & Cdrom Review, (1994) 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harry, V., Oppenheim, C.: Evaluations of Electronic Databases, Part 1: Criteria for Testing Cdrom Products. Online & Cdrom Review, (1993) 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henninger, S., Belkin N.J.: Interface Issues and Interaction Strategies for Information Retrieval Systems. Proceeding of SGICHI (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heppner, P.P.: The Problem Solving Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herther, N.: Text Retrieval Software For Microcomputers, Online, (1986b) 105Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh Yee, I: Search Tactics of Web Users in Searching for Texts, Graphics, Known Items and Subjects: A Search Simulation Study. The Reference Librarian, (1998) 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonassen, D.H., Wang, S.: Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, (1993) 201Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leader, L.F., Klein, J. D.: The Effects of Search Tool Type and Cognitive Style on Performance During Hypermedia Database Searches. Educational Technology Research & Development (1996) 442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, M., Reed, M.W.: The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computer in Human Behavior, (1994) 10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moss, N., Hale, G.: Cognitive Style and Its Effect on Internet Searching: A Quantitative Investigation. Proceeding of European Conference on Educational Research. (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nahl, D., Tenopir, C.: Affective and Cognitive Searching Behavior of Novice End-Users of a Full-Text Database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1996 47 AprilCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Repman, J., Rooze, G. E., Weller H.G.: Interaction of learner cognitive style with components of hypermedia-based instruction. Journal of Hypermedia and Multimedia Studies, (1991) 21Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Su, L.T., Chen, H.L.: User Evaluation of Web Search Engines As Prototype Digital Library Retrieval Tools. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tegenbos, J., Nieuwenhuysen, P.: My Kingdom for an Agent? Evaluation of Autonomy, an Intelligent Search Agent for the Internet. Online & Cdrom Review, (1997) 213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang, P., Tenopir, C.: An Exploratory Study of Users’ Interaction with World Wide Web Resoures, Information Skills, Cognitive Styles, Affective States and Searching Behaviors. Proceeding of 19th Annual National Online Meeting. (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    White, M. D., Iivonen, M.: Factors Influencing Web Strategies. Proceeding of ASIS Annual Conference (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, P.R., Cox, P.W.: Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, (1977) 47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tek Yong Lim
    • 1
  • Enya Kong Tang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations