INDIGO—An Approach to Infrastructures for Digital Libraries
In this paper INDIGO, an approach to infrastructures for digital libraries is presented. It fulfills two crucial requirements to digital libraries: scalability and the ability to handle newly evolving document types. Based on a classification of digital library architectures, the main reasons for limited scalability and extensibility of digital libraries are identified. To overcome the identified problems the concept of mobile structure knowledge, on which INDIGO is based, is developed. The architecture of INDIGO is outlined and examples for the application of the concept are given.
KeywordsDigital Library Structure Knowledge Document Type Server Side Client Side
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.William P. Birmingham. An Agent-BasedArchitecture for Digital Libraries. D-Lib magazine, July 1995. http://hdl:cnri.dlib/july95-birmingham.Google Scholar
- 2.L. Daigle, P. Deutsch, B. Heelan, C. Alpaugh, and M. Maclachlan. Uniform Resource Agents (URAs). ftp://ftp.denic.de/pub/rfc/rfc2016.txt [7.12.1999], 1996. RFC 2016.
- 3.Marion Flickner, Harpreet Sawhney, Wayne Niblack, Jonathan Ashley, Qian Huang, Byron Dom, Monika Gorkani, Jim Hafner, Denis Lee, Dragutin Petkovic, David Steele, and Peter Yanker. Query by Image andVideo Content:TheQBICSystem. IEEE Computer,Vol.28(Nr.9),September 1995.Google Scholar
- 5.Martin Geier, Martin Steckermeier, Ulrich Becker, Franz J. Hauck, Erich Meier, and Uwe Rastofer. Support for mobility and replication in the AspectIX architecture. Technical ReportTR-I4-08-05, IMMD IV, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 1998.Google Scholar
- 6.Dag Johansen, Robbert van Renesse, and Fred B. Schneider. An Introduction to the TACOMA Distributed System Version 1.0. Technical Report 95–23, June 1995.Google Scholar
- 7.Robert Kahn and Robert Wilensky. A Framework for Distributed Digital Object Services. http://hdl:cnri.dlib/tn95–01, 1995.Google Scholar
- 8.A. Lingnau, P. Dömel, and O. Drobnik. A HTTP-based Infrastructure for Mobile Agents. In Proceedings of the 4th International World Wide Web Conference, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
- 9.Christian Mönch and Oswald Drobnik. Integrating new document types into digital libraries. In Proceedings of the IEEE Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries IEEE ADL’ 98, pages 56–65. IEEE, April 1998.Google Scholar
- 10.Michael L. Nelson, Kurt Maly, Mohammad Zubair, and Stewart N. T. Shen. Soda: Smart objects, dumb archives. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries—Third uropean Conference, ECDL’99, volume 1696 of LNCS, pages 453–464, Paris, Frankreich,September1999Google Scholar
- 11.Peter J. Nürnberg, Richard Furuta, John L. Leggett, Catherine C. Marshall, and Frank M. Shipmann jrIII. Digital Libraries: Issues and Architectures. In Proceedings of The Second International Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, pages 147–153, June 1995.Google Scholar
- 13.Thomas A. Phelps. Multivalent Documents: Anytime, Anywhere, Any Type, EveryWay User-Improvable Digital Documents and Systems. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.Val Tannen. Heterogenous data integration with mobile information managers. In Sushil Jajodia, M.Tamer özsu, andAsuman Dogac, editors, Proceedings of Advances in Multimedia Information Systems, MIS’98, volume 1508 of LNCS, pages 2–3. Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
- 16.Maarten van Steen, Philip Homburg, and Andrew S. Tanenbaum. Globe: A wide-area distributed system. IEEE Concurrency, pages 70–78, Jan-Mar 1999.Google Scholar
- 18.Michael P. Wellman, Edmund H. Durfee, and William P. Birmingham. The digital library as a community of information agents. IEEE Expert — Intelligent Systems & Their Application, 11(3):10–11, June 1996.Google Scholar