QUEST — Querying Specialized Collections on theWeb

  • Martin Heß
  • Christian Mönch
  • Oswald Drobnik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1923)


of the techniques Ensuring access to specialized web-collections in a fast evolving web environment requires flexible techniques for orientation and querying. The adoption of meta search techniques for web-collections is hindered by the enormous heterogeneity of the resources. In this paper we introduce QUEST—a system for querying specialized collections on the web. One focus of QUEST is to unify search fields from different collections by relating the search concepts to each other in a concept-taxonomy. To identify the most relevant collections according to a user query, we propose an associationbased strategy. Furthermore the Frankurt Core is introduced—a metadata-scheme for describing web-collections as a whole. Its fields are filled automatically by a metadata-collector component. Finally a prototype of QUEST is presented, demonstrating the integration in an overall architecture.


Digital Library Resource Description Framework Description Logic Query Term Resource Discovery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    J. Ambite, N. Ashish, G. Barish, C. Knoblock, S. Minton, P. Modi, I. Muslea, A. Philpot, and S. Tejada. ARIADNE: A system for constructing mediators for internet sources. In Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, Seattle,WA, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    R. Brachmann, A. Borgida, D. McGuinness, and P. Patel-Schneider. ‘Reducing’ CLASSIC to practice: Knowledge representation theory meets reality. In KR’92 Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Proceedings of the Third International Conference, pages 247–258.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    C. Plaunt and B. Norgard. An association-based method for automatic andexing with a controlled vocabulary. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Volume90 Nr.10, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    H. Garcia-Molina, Y. Papakonstantinou, D. Quass, A. Rajaraman, Y. Sagiv, J. Ullman, and J. Widom. The tsimmis approach to mediation: Data models and languages. In Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    T. Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999., 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    A. L. Powell J. C. French and J. Callan. Effective and efficient automatic database selection. In Technical Report CS-99-08, Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Z. Lu J. P. Callan and B. Croft. Searching distributed collections with inference networks. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGIR Conference, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    B. Jansen, A. Spink, J. Bateman, and T. Saracevic. Real life information retrieval: A study of user queries on the web. In SIGIR Forum (ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval), volume 32 Number 1, pages 5–17, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    C. Jenkins, M. Jackson, P. Burden, and J. Wallis. Automatic RDF Metadata Generation for Resource Discovery. In Proceedings of the 8th International WWW Conference, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    H. Garcia-Molina L. Gravano and A. Tomasic. The effectiveness of GlOSS for the textdatabase discovery problem. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    A. Levy, A. Rajaraman, and J. Ordille. Querying heterogeneous information sources using source descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd VLDB Conference, Mumbai, India, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    R. Möller, V. Haarslev, and B. Neumann. Semantics-based Information Retrieval. In International Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems, Vienna, Budapest, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    N. Fuhr. Resource Discovery in Distributed Digital Libraries. In Digital Libraries’ 99: Advanced Methods and Technologies, Digital Collections,St. Petersburg State University., 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    D. Rafiei and A. O. Mendelzon. What is this Page known for? Computing Web Page Reputations. In Proceedings of the 9th International WWW Conference, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press Books, Addison-Wesley, 1999.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    A. Sugiura and O. Etzioni. Query Routing for Web Search Engines: Architecture and Experiments. In Proceedings of the 9th International WWW Conference, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    S. Weibel, J. Kunze, C. Lagoze, and M. Wolf. Dublin Core Metadata for Resource Discovery., 1998. RFC 2413.
  18. 19.
    C. Welty. DLs for DLs: Description Logics for Digital Libraries. In Proceedings of the 1998 International Workshop for Description Logics, Trento, Italia, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Heß
    • 1
  • Christian Mönch
    • 1
  • Oswald Drobnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceJohann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations