Skip to main content

Comparing the Locomotion Dynamics of the Cockroach and a Shape Deposition Manufactured Biomimetic Hexapod

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 271))

Abstract

We describe the locomotion dynamics of a biomimetic robot and compare them with those of its exemplar: the cockroach. The robot is a small (0.275kg) hexapod created using a layered manufacturing technique that allows us to tailor the compliance and damping of the limbs to achieve passive stabilization similar to that observed in insects. The robot runs at over 3 body-lengths per second (55 cm/s) and easily traverses hip-height obstacles. However, high-speed video and force data reveal differences between the robot’s locomotion dynamics and the inverted spring-pendulum model that characterizes most running animals, including cockroaches. Closer examination of the individual leg forces shows that these differences stem from the behavior of the middle and rear legs and points to suggestions for future designs and further experimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Raibert, M. H., “Legged robots that balance,” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGeer, T., “Passive dynamic walking,” IJRR, Volume 9, 62–82, April 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson, G. M., Quinn, R. D., Bachmann, R. J., Flannigan, W. C., Ritzmann, R. E., and Watson, J. T., “Design and Simulation of a Cockroach-like Hexapod Robot,” IEEE ICRA Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM, 1106–1111, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cruse, H., Dean, J., Muller, U., and Schmitz, J., “The stick insect as a walking robot,” Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy, 936–940, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey, S. A., Cham, J. G., Cutkosky, M. R., and Full, R. J., “Biomimetic Mechanisms via Shape Deposition Manufacturing,” in Robotics Research: the 9th International Symposium, J. Hollerbach and D. Koditschek (Eds), Springer-Verlag, London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, X., Cheng, W., Dudek, D., Hatanaka, M., Cutkosky, M. R., and Full, R. J., “Material Modeling for Shape Deposition Manufacturing of Biomimetic Components,” ASME Proceedings of DETC/DFM 2000, Baltimore, Maryland, September 10–14, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Full, R. J., and Tu, M. S., “Mechanics of a Rapid Running Insect: Two-, Four-, and Six-legged Locomotion,” Journal of Experimental Biology, 156, 215–231, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Full, R. J., and Tu, M. S., “Mechanics of Six-legged Runners,” J. Exp. Bio., 148, 129–146, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Full, R. J., Autumn, K., Chung, J. I., Ahn, A., “Rapid negotiation of rough terrain by the death-head cockroach,” American Zoologist, 38:81A, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saranli, U., Buehler, M., and Koditschek, D. E., “Design, Modeling, and Control of a Compliant Hexapod Robot,” IEEE ICRA Proceedings, 2589–2596, San Francisco, USA, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Full, R.J. and Koditschek, D. E., “Templates and Anchors-Neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land,” J. Exp. Bio. 202, 3325–3332, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cham, J. G., Bailey, S. A., and Cutkosky, M. R., “Robust Dynamic Locomotion Through Feedforward-Preflex Interaction,” ASME IMECE Proceedings, Orlando, Florida, November 5–10, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ringrose, R., “Self-stabilizing running,” IEEE ICRA Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, I. E., and Loeb, G. E., “A reductionist approach to creating and using neuromusculoskeletal models,” in Biomechanics and Neural Control of Movement, Winters, J. M. and Crago. P. E. (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kubow, T. M., and Full, R. J., “The role of the mechanical system in control: A hypothesis of self-stabilization in hexapedal runners,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B. 354, 849–862, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijer, K., Full, R. J., “Stabilizing properties of invertebrate skeletal muscle,” American Zoologist, Volume 39, Number 5, 117A, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clark, J. E., Cham, J. G., Bailey, S. A., Froehlich, E. M., Full, R. J., and Cutkosky, M. R., “Biomimetic Design and Fabrication of a Hexapedal Running Robot,” Submitted to IEEE ICRA, Seoul, Korea, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Full, R. J. and Meijer, K., “Artificial muscles versus natural actuators from frogs to flies,” In Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) (ed. Yoseph Bar-Cohen). Proc. SPIE Vol. 3987, p. 2–9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cavagna, G. A., Heglund, N. C., and Taylor, C. R., “Walking, Running, and Galloping: Mechanical Similarities between Different Animals,” Scale Effects in Animal Locomotion, Proceedings of an International Symposium, T. J. Pedley (Ed.), 111–125, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blickhan, R., and Full, R.J., “Locomotion energetics of the ghost crab. II. Mechanics of the centre of masss during running and walking,” J. exp. Biol., 130, 155–174, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Full, R.J. and Farley, C. T., “Musculoskeletal dynamics in rhythmic systems-a comparative approach to legged locomotion,” in Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement, J. M. Winters and P. E. Crago (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Full, R.J. and Blickhan, R. and Ting, L.H., “Leg design in hexapedal runners,” J. Exp. Bio. 158, 369–390, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bailey, S.A., Cham, J.G., Cutkosky, M.R., Full, R.J. (2001). Comparing the Locomotion Dynamics of the Cockroach and a Shape Deposition Manufactured Biomimetic Hexapod. In: Rus, D., Singh, S. (eds) Experimental Robotics VII. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45118-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45118-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42104-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45118-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics