Sexual Selection of Co-operation
Advocates of sexual selection theory have argued that various male traits, such as male co-operative behavior towards females, can evolve through female preference for mating with those males who possess that trait. This paper reports on the results of a simulation performed to test the hypothesis that female preference for mating with co-operative males can lead to an increase in the proportions of males in a population who co-operate with females. We simply model the sex differences using a single variable measuring the cost of reproduction. Our results show that even in such a simple environment there are a large number of interacting variables, which complicate the relationship between the sexual selection of co-operative males by females and the proportion of males actually co-operating with females. In fact, in most situations we modeled, sexual selection of co-operative males by females ended up causing the proportion of females that co-operate with males to increase while the proportion of males co-operating with females showed no significant increase over the random selection experiments.
KeywordsSexual Selection Parental Investment Female Preference Game Playing Male Trait
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Co-operation, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- 2.Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. (1987) “The Evolution of Co-operation”, In Axelrod R. The Complexity of Co-operation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- 4.Corning, P. (1998) “The Cooperative Gene: On the Role of Synergy in Evolution”. Evolutionary Theory, vol. 11, pp. 183–207. 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.Darwin, C. (1900) The Decent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Werner Company, Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
- 6.De Waal, F. (1982) Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD.Google Scholar
- 7.Dugatkin, L. (1999) Cheating Monkeys and Citizen Bees: The Nature of Cooperation in Animals and Humans. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Miller, (2000), The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Doublesday, London.Google Scholar
- 12.Noe, R. “Alliance Formation Among Male Baboons”, In Harcourt A. & de Waal F. Coalitions and Alliances in Human and Other Animals, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 285–321.Google Scholar
- 13.Nowak, M., May, R., and SIGMUND, K. (1995), The Arithmetics of Mutual Help, Scientific American, June 1995, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar
- 15.Trivers, R. (1972) “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection”. In Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man, London, Heinemann, 1972, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar