Skip to main content

Optimization Using Particle Swarms with Near Neighbor Interactions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2723))

Abstract

This paper presents a modification of the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) intended to combat the problem of premature convergence observed in many applications of PSO. In the new algorithm, each particle is attracted towards the best previous positions visited by its neighbors, in addition to the other aspects of particle dynamics in PSO. This is accomplished by using the ratio of the relative fitness and the distance of other particles to determine the direction in which each component of the particle position needs to be changed. The resulting algorithm, known as Fitness-Distance-Ratio based PSO (FDR-PSO), is shown to perform significantly better than the original PSO algorithm and several of its variants, on many different benchmark optimization problems. Avoiding premature convergence allows FDR-PSO to continue search for global optima in difficult multimodal optimization problems, reaching better solutions than PSO and several of its variants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R., “Particle Swarm Optimization”, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eberhart, R. and Kennedy, J., “A New Optimizer Using Particles Swarm Theory”, Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995, Nayoga, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eberhart, R. and Shi, Y., “Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization”, The 7th Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1998, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shi, Y. H., Eberhart, R. C., “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer”, IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 1998, Anchorage, Alaska.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy J., “Small Worlds and MegaMinds: Effects of Neighbourhood Topology on Particle Swarm Performance”, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress of Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, 1931–1938. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lovbjerg, M., Rasmussen, T. K., Krink, T., “ Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimiser with Breeding and Subpopulations”, Proceedings of Third Genetic Evolutionary Computation, (GECCO 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carlisle, A. and Dozier, G.. “Adapting Particle Swarm Optimization to Dynamic Environments”, Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp. 429–434, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R. C., and Shi, Y. H.,_Swarm Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. GEATbx: Genetic and Evolutionary Algorithm Toolbox for MATLAB, Hartmut Pohlheim, http://www.systemtechnik.tu-ilmenau.de/~pohlheim/GA_Toolbox/index.html.

  10. E. Ozcan and C. K. Mohan, “Particle Swarm Optimzation: Surfing the Waves”, Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC’99), Washington D. C., July 1999, pp 1939–1944.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Particle Swarm Optimization Code, Yuhui Shi, www.engr.iupui.edu/~shi

    Google Scholar 

  12. van den Bergh, F., Engelbrecht, A. P., “Cooperative Learning in Neural Networks using Particle Swarm Optimization”, South African Computer Journal, pp. 84–90, Nov. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. van den Bergh, F., Engelbrecht, A. P., “Effects of Swarm Size on Cooperative Particle Swarm Optimisers”, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, San Francisco, USA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lovbjerg, M., Krink, T., “Extending Particle Swarm Optimisers with Self-Organized Criticality”, Proceedings of Fourth Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1588–1593.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao-Feng Xie, Wen-Jun Zhang, Zhi-Lian Yang, “Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimizer with Mass Extinction”, International Conf. on Communication, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS), Chengdu, China, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao-Feng Xie, Wen-Jun Zhang, Zhi-Lian Yang, “A Dissipative Particle Swarm Optimization”, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacques Riget, Jakob S. Vesterstorm, “A Diversity-Guided Particle Swarm Optimizer-The ARPSO”, EVALife Technical Report no. 2002-02.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Veeramachaneni, K., Peram, T., Mohan, C., Osadciw, L.A. (2003). Optimization Using Particle Swarms with Near Neighbor Interactions. In: Cantú-Paz, E., et al. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation — GECCO 2003. GECCO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2723. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45105-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40602-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45105-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics