Skip to main content

Towards a Unified Programming Language

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ECOOP 2000 — Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1850))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The goal of research in programming languages should be to develop languages that integrates the best of concepts and constructs from the various programming paradigms. We do not argue for a multi-paradigm language, where the programmer alternates between the different paradigms/styles. Instead, we find that the languages of the future should integrate the best available concepts and constructs in such a way that the programmer does not think of multiple paradigms when using a given language. In this paper, we describe to what extent the BETA language has been successful in obtaining a unified style and where more research is needed. In addition to traditional paradigms such as object-oriented-, imperative-functional- and logic programming, we also discuss concurrent programming and prototype-based programming. We discuss language features such as the BETA pattern construct, virtual procedures and classes, higher order classes, methods and functions, part objects, block-structure, and class-less objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, K., Gosling, J.: The Java Programming Language. Addison Wesley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bobrow, D.G., Stefik, M.: The LOOPS Manual. Xerox Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borning, A.: The Programming Language Aspects of Thinglab, a Constraint-Oriented Simulation Laboratory. ACM Trans. on Programming Languages and Systems, 3(4):353–387, October 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brinch-Hansen, P.: The Programming Language Concurrent Pascal. IEEE Trans Software Engineering, 1(2), (1975), 149–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brinch-Hansen, P.: Java’s Insecure Parallelism. ACM SIGPLAN, Vol. 34, No. 4, April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Budd, T.A.: Multiparadigm Programming in Leda. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coplien, J.: Multi-Paradigm Design for C++. Addison Wesley Longman, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dahl, O.-J., Nygaard, K., Myrhaug, B.: Simula 67 Common Base Language. Technical Report Publ. no. S-2, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst, E.: gbeta — a Language with Virtual Attributes, Block Structure, and Propagating, Dynamic Inheritance. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ernst. E.: Propagating Class and Method Combination. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed).: 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Lisbon, June 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1628. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Floyd, R.W.: The Paradigms of Programming. Comm. of the ACM, 22(8), 445–460, August 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman-Benson, B.N., Borning, A.: Integrating Constraints with an Object-Oriented Language. In: Madsen, O.L. (ed).: 6th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Utrecht, June/July. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 615. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R.E., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Object-Oriented Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg, A., Robson, D.: Smalltak-80: The Language and its Implementation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoare, C.A.R.: Notes on Data Structuring. In: Dahl, O.-J., Dijkstra, E., Hoare, C.A.R.: Structured Programming. Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Igarashi, A., Pierce, B.C.: Foundations for Virtual Types. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed).: 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Lisbon, June 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1628. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knudsen, J.L., Löfgren, M., Madsen, O.L., Magnusson, B.: Object-Oriented Environments — The Mjølner Approach. Prentice Hall, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kristensen, B.B., Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B. Nygaard, K.: Abstraction Mechanisms in the BETA Programming Language. In Conference Record of the Tenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. Austin, Texas, January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kristensen, B.B., Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B. Nygaard, K.: Classification of Actions or Inheritance also for Methods. In: 1st European Conference Object-oriented programming, Paris, France, June 1987. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 276. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1987.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liebermann, H.: Using Prototypical Objects to Implement Shared behavior in Object-Oriented Systems. Proc. OOPSLA’86, Portland, OR, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacLennan, B.J.: Values and Objects in Programming Languages. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 17(1982) 12(Dec), 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B., Nygaard, K.: Object-Oriented Programming in the BETA Programming Language. Addison Wesley/ACM Press, Wokingham, England, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B.: What Object-Oriented Programming may be and What it does not have to be. In: Gjessing, S., Nygaard, K. (eds).: 2nd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Oslo, August 1988. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 322. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1988.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B.: Virtual Classes, a Powerful Mechanism in Object-Oriented Languages. In: Proc. OOPSLA’89, New Orleans, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B.: Part Objects and their Locations. In: (Magnusson, B., Meyer, B., Perrot, J.F. (eds).: Proc. Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems — TOOLS10. Prentice-Hall, 1993, pp. 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Madsen, O.L., Magnusson, B., Møller-Pedersen, B.: Strong Typing of Object-Oriented Languages Revisited. In: Proc. OOPSLA’90, Ottawa, Canada, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Madsen, O.L.: Block Structure and Object-Oriented Languages. In: Shriver, B.D., Wegner, P. (eds).: Research Directions in Object-Oriented Programming. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Madsen, O.L.: An Overview of BETA. In.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Madsen, O.L.: Open Issues in Object-Oriented Programming-A Scandinavian Perspective. Software Practice and Experience, Vol. 25, No. S4, Dec. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Madsen, O.L: Toward Integration of State Machines and OO Languages. In: Mitchell, R. et al.: (eds).: Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems 29, Nancy, June 1999. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Madsen, O.L.: Semantic Analysis of Virtual Classes and Nested Classes. In: Proc. OOPSLA’ 99, Denver, Colorado, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Magnusson, B.: An Overview of Simula. In.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Magnusson, B.: Personal Communication, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nygaard, K.: GOODS to Appear on the Stage. In: Aksit, M., Matsouka, S. (eds).: 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1241. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nygaard, K. Sørgaard, P.: The Perspective Concept in Informatics. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., Kyng, M. (eds).: Computers and Democracy. Abury, Aldershot, UK, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. The Mjølner System, http://www.mjolner.com.

  38. Rogerson, D.: Inside COM-Microsoft’s Component Object Model, Microsoft Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rumbaugh, J. Jacobsen, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Salvesen, A., Wang, A.: Primula — An Integration of Prolog and Simula. Report no. 781, Norwegian Computing Center, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stroustrup, B.: The C++ Programming Language. Addison-Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thorup, K.K.: Genericity in Java with Virtual Types. In: Aksit, M., Matsouka, S. (eds).: 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1241. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Thorup, K.K.: Objective-C. In: Zamir, S. (ed).: Handbook of Object Technology. CRC Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thorup, K.K.: Genericity in Java with Virtual Classes. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S.: (ed).: 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Lisbon, June 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1241. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thorup, K.K., Torgersen, M.: Unifying Genericity-Combining the Benefits of Virtual Types and parameterized Types. In: Guerraoui, R. (ed).: 13th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Lisbon, June 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1628. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Torgersen, M.: Virtual Types are Statically Safe. In:Bruce, K. (ed). 5th Workshop on Foundations of Object-Oriented Languages, (San Diego, CA, January 16–17, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Torgersen, M.: Unifying Abstraction. “Progress Report” in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. Computer Science Department, Aarhus University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ungar, D., Smith, R.B.: SELF — The Power of Simplicity. In: Proc. OOPSLA’87, Orlando, FL, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wegner, P.: On the Unification of Data and Program Abstraction in Ada. In Conference Record of the Tenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. Austin, Texas, January 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wegner, P.: Concepts and Paradigms of Object-Oriented Programming. Object-Oriented Messenger 1, 1 August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wikstrøm, A.: Functional Programming using Standard ML. Prentice-Hall NJ, Englewood Cliffs, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Østerbye, K.: Associations as a Language Construct. In: Mitchell, R. et al.: (eds).: Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems 29, Nancy, June 1999. IEEE Computer Society, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Østerbye, K.: Parts, Wholes and Sub-Classes. In Proc. European Simulation Multiconference, ISBN 0-911801-1, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Madsen, O.L. (2000). Towards a Unified Programming Language. In: Bertino, E. (eds) ECOOP 2000 — Object-Oriented Programming. ECOOP 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1850. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45102-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45102-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67660-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45102-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics