Abstract
Opinions about the nature and origin of granite have divided geologists for the greater part of the history of the subject as a recognised branch of the natural sciences. The earliest known controversy in the later part of the eighteenth century revolved around the contrasting views of two schools of thought, the Neptunists and the Plutonists. The Neptunists were represented principally by Abraham Werner of Freiberg 1749-1817, and the Plutonists by James Hutton of Edinburgh 1726-97. The Neptunists believed that granites were a chemical precipitate from a universal ocean whereas the plutonists considered them to be due to the consolidation of matter made fluid by heat. Hutton observed veins of granite which had intruded crystalline metamorphic rocks in the Scottish Highlands, and concluded that they could only have originated by the solidification of molten rock material injected from below. This observation contributed to the eventual resolution of the dispute in the favour of the Plutonists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2000). The Granite Controversy and its Aftermath. In: The Geology and Mapping of Granite Batholiths. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 96. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45055-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45055-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67684-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45055-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive