Advertisement

Cognition Meets Le Corbusier — Cognitive Principles of Architectural Design

  • Steffen Werner
  • Paul Long
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2685)

Abstract

Research on human spatial memory and navigational ability has recently shown the strong influence of reference systems in spatial memory on the ways spatial information is accessed in navigation and other spatially oriented tasks. One of the main findings can be characterized as a large cognitive cost, both in terms of speed and accuracy that occurs whenever the reference system used to encode spatial information in memory is not aligned with the reference system required by a particular task. In this paper, the role of aligned and misaligned reference systems is discussed in the context of the built environment and modern architecture. The role of architectural design on the perception and mental representation of space by humans is investigated. The navigability and usability of built space is systematically analysed in the light of cognitive theories of spatial and navigational abilities of humans. It is concluded that a building’s navigability and related wayfinding issues can benefit from architectural design that takes into account basic results of spatial cognition research.

Keywords

Spatial Information Reference System Architectural Design Spatial Knowledge Floor Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In R. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 46–80). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, P. & Passini, R. (1992). Wayfinding: People, Signes, & Architecture New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, L. A. (1999). Selecting a reference frame. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, K. & Gallistel, R. (1984). Testing the geometric power of an animal’s spatial representation. In H.L. Roitblat, T.G. Bever, & H.S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 409–423). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Gallistel, R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Gillner, S. & Mallot, H.A. (1998) Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Golledge, R.G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In R. Golledge (Ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 5–45). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  9. Gouteux, S., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Vauclair, J. (2001). Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hermer, L. & Spelke, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermer, L. & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Le Corbusier. (1931 / 1986). Towards a new architecture. New York: DoverGoogle Scholar
  13. Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 111, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  15. McNamara, T.P., Rump, B., & Werner, S. (in press). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Google Scholar
  16. Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment and Behavior, 23, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Neill, M.J. (1991). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23, 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Passini, R. (1984). Wayfinding in Architecture New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  19. Pederson, E. (1993). Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In A.U. Frank & I. Camari (Eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 294–311). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Poucet, B. (1993). Spatial cognitive maps in animals: New hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychological Review, 100, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Presson, C.C. & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1984). Building spatial representations through primary and secondary learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rock, I. (1979). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schölkopf, B. and Mallot, H. A. (1995). View-based cognitive mapping and planning. Adaptive Behavior 3, 311–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102–104.Google Scholar
  25. Shelton, A.L. & McNamara, T.P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sholl, M.J. & Nolin, T.L. (1999). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar
  27. Sholl, M.J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55–82.Google Scholar
  29. Wehner, R., Michel, B., & Antonsen, P. (1996). Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 129–140.Google Scholar
  30. Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Werner, S. (2001). Role of environmental reference systems in human spatial memory. Poster presented at the 42 nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 15–18 November, 2001Google Scholar
  32. Werner, S. & Jaeger, M. (2002.). Intrinsic reference systems in map displays. To appear in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  33. Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B., & Herrmann, T. (2000). Modelling spatial knowledge by route graphs. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications, LNAI 1849 (pp. 295–316). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Werner, S. & Schmidt, K. (1999). Environmental reference systems for large-scale spaces. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Werner, S. & Schmidt, T. (2000). Investigating spatial reference systems through distortions in visual memory. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications, LNAI 1849 (pp. 169–183). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Werner, S. Schmidt, T., & Jainek, V. (in prep.). The role of environmental slant in human spatial memory.Google Scholar
  37. Werner, S., Saade, C. & Lüer, G. (1998). Relations between the mental representation of extrapersonal space and spatial behavior. In K.-F. Wender, C. Freksa & C. Habel (Eds.), Spatial Cognition-An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, LNAI 1404 (pp. 108–127). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Wiltschko, R. & Wiltschko, W. (1999). Compass orientation as a basic element in avian orientation and navigation. In R. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding behavior (pp. 259–293). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steffen Werner
    • 1
  • Paul Long
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations