Contextual Effects on Word Order: Information Structure and Information Theory

  • Nobo Komagata
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2680)

Abstract

To account for a type of contextual effect on word order, some researchers propose theme-first (old things first) principles. However, their universality has been questioned due to the existence of counterexamples and the possibility of arguably rheme-first (new things first) languages. Capturing the contextual effects on theme-rheme ordering (information structure) in terms of information theory, this paper argues that word order is affected by the distribution of informativeness, an idea also consistent with counterexamples and rheme-first languages.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Knud Lambrecht. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vilém Mathesius. A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis, edited by Josef Vachek. The Hague: Mouton, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jan Firbas. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1:267–280, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. A. K. Halliday. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nobo N. Komagata. A Computational Analysis of Information Structure Using Parallel Expository Texts in English and Japanese. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nobo Komagata. Information structure in subordinate and subordinate-like clauses in special issue on discourse and information structure (to appear). Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3), 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petr Sgall, Eva Hajičová, and Jarmila Panevova. The meaning of the sentence in its semantic and pragmatic aspects. D. Reidel, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marianne Mithun. Morphological and prosodic forces shaping word order. In Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan, editors, Word Order in Discourse. John Benjamins, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doris L. Payne. Information structuring in papago narrative discourse. Language, 63(4):783–804, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chet A. Creider and Jane T. Creider. Topic-comment relation in a verb-initial language. J. African Languages and Linguistics, 5:1–15, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elena M. Leman. Cheyenne Major Constituent Order. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enric Vallduví. The informational component. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fred I. Dretske. Knowledge and the Flow of Information (originally published in 1981 from the MIT Press). CSLI, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Kruijff-Korbayová, G.J.M. Kruijff, and John Bateman. Generation of contextually appropriate word order. In Kees van Deemter and Rodger Kibble, editors, Information sharing. CSLI, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fazlollah M. Reza. An Introduction to Information Theory (first published in 1961 by McGraw-Hill). Dover, 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze. Foundation of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yehoshua Bar-Hillel. Language and Information. Addison-Wesley, 1964.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frederick J. Crosson and Kenneth M. Sayre, editors. Philosophy and Cybernetics. University of Notre Dame, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Colin Cherry. On human communication: a review, a survey, and a criticism. MIT Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Angelica Kratzer. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, editors, The Generic Book, pages 125–175. University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nomi Erteschik-Shir. The syntax-focus structure interface. In Peter W. Culicover and Louise McNally, editors, Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 29: The limits of syntax, pages 211–240. Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mark Steedman. Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4):649–689, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Doris L. Payne. Verb initial languages and information order. In Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan, editors, Word Order in Discourse. John Benjamins, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pamela Downing. Word order in discourse: By way of introduction. In Pamela Downing and Michael Noonan, editors, Word Order in Discourse. John Benjamins, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knud Lambrecht. On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Russell S. Tomlin, editor, Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, pages 217–262. John Benjamins, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marianne Mithun. Is basic word order universal? In Doris L. Payne, editor, Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, pages 15–62. John Benjamins, 1992.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doris L. Payne. Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in ‘o’odham. In Doris L. Payne, editor, Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, pages 137–166. John Benjamins, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Russell S. Tomlin and Richard Rhodes. Information distribution in Ojibwa. In Doris L. Payne, editor, Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, pages 117–136. John Benjamins, 1992.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ellen F. Prince. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole, editor, Radical Pragmatics, pages 223–256. Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobo Komagata
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe College of New JerseyEwingUSA

Personalised recommendations