Skip to main content

Automatic Derivation and Application of Induction Schemes for Mutually Recursive Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Logic — CL 2000 (CL 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1861))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper advocates and explores the use of multi-predicate induction schemes for proofs about mutually recursive functions. The interactive application of multi-predicate schemes stemming from datatype definitions is already well-established practice; this paper describes an automated proof procedure based on multi-predicate schemes. Multi-predicate schemes may be formally derived from (mutually recursive) function definitions; such schemes are often helpful in proving properties of mutually recursive functions where the recursion pattern does not follow that of the underlying datatypes. These ideas have been implemented using the HOL theorem prover and the Clam proof planner.

Research supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of Great Britain under grants GR/L03071 and GR/L14381. The authors thank Alan Bundy, Ian Green and Christoph Walther for their feedback on this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Boulton, K. Slind, A. Bundy, and M. Gordon. An interface between CLAM and HOL. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs’ 98), volume 1479 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 87–104, Springer, 1998.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Boulton. Multi-predicate induction schemes for mutual recursion. Informatics Research Report EDI-INF-RR-0014, Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, April 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. S. Boyer and J S. Moore. A Computational Logic. ACM Monograph Series. Academic Press, New York, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bundy, A. Stevens, F. van Harmelen, A. Ireland, and A. Smaill. Rippling: A heuristic for guiding inductive proofs. Artificial Intelligence, 62:185–253, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bundy, F. van Harmelen, C. Horn, and A. Smaill. The OYSTER-CLAM system. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, volume 449 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 647–648, Springer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. J. C. Gordon and T. F. Melham, editors. Introduction to HOL: A theorem proving environment for higher order logic. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. T. Hesketh. Using Middle-Out Reasoning to Guide Inductive Theorem Proving. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Kapur and M. Subramaniam. Automating induction over mutually recursive functions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Algebraic Methodology and Software Technology (AMAST’96), volume 1101 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Liu and R.-J. Chang. A new structural induction scheme for proving properties of mutually recursive concepts. In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 1, pages 144–148. AAAI, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. C. Paulson. ML for the Working Programmer. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, July 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Protzen. Lazy generation of induction hypotheses. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-12), volume 814 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 42–56, Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Slind. Function definition in higher-order logic. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs’96), volume 1125 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 381–397, Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Slind. Derivation and use of induction schemes in higher-order logic. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs’97), volume 1275 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 275–290, Springer, 1997.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Slind. Reasoning about Terminating Functional Programs. PhD Thesis, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, 1999. Accessible at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/kxs/papers.

  15. M. VanInwegen and E. Gunter. HOL-ML. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Higher Order Logic Theorem Proving and its Applications (HUG’93), volume 780 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 61–74, Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Walther. Combining induction axioms by machine. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93), volume 1, pages 95–100, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boulton, R.J., Slind, K. (2000). Automatic Derivation and Application of Induction Schemes for Mutually Recursive Functions. In: Lloyd, J., et al. Computational Logic — CL 2000. CL 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1861. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44957-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44957-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67797-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44957-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics