Abstract
A variety of results which enable model checking of important classes of infinite-state systems are based on exploiting the property of data independence. The literature contains a number of definitions of variants of data independence, which are given by syntactic restrictions in particular formalisms. More recently, data independence was defined for labelled transition systems using logical relations, enabling results about data independent systems to be proved without reference to a particular syntax. In this paper, we show that the semantic definition is sufficiently strong for this purpose. More precisely, it was known that any syntactically data independent symbolic LTS denotes a semantically data independent family of LTSs, but here we show that the converse also holds.
We acknowledge support from the EPSRC Standard Research Grant ‘Exploiting Data Independence’, GR/M32900. A part of this research was done at the Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
Also affiliated to the Mathematical Institute, Belgrade. This author was supported in part by a grant from the Intel Corporation, a Junior Research Fellowship from Christ Church, Oxford, and previously by a scholarship from Hajrija & Boris Vukobrat and Copechim France SA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Alimohamed. A characterization of lambda definability in categorical models of implicit polymorphism. Theoretical Computer Science, 146:5–23, 1995.
J. Bohn, W. Damm, O. Grumberg, H. Hungar, and K. Laster. First-order-CTL model checking. In Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FST&TCS’98), volume 1530 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 283–294. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
M. Calder and C. Shankland. A symbolic semantics and bisimulation for full LOTOS. In International Conference on Formal Description Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems (FORTE’01), pages 184–200. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
K. M. Chandy and J. Misra. Parallel Program Design: A Foundation. Addison-Wesley, 1988.
E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, and D. A. Peled. Model Checking. MIT Press, 1999.
D. Dill, R. Hojati, and R.K. Brayton. Verifying linear temporal properties of data intensive controllers using finite instantiations. In Hardware Description Languages and their Applications (CHDL’ 97). Chapman and Hall, 1997.
M. Fiore and A. Simpson. Lambda definability with sums via Grothendieck logical relations. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA’99), volume 1581 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 147–161. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
J. Goubault-Larrecq, S. Lasota, and D. Nowak. Logical relations for monadic types. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the European Association for Computer Science Logic (CSL’02), volume 2471 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 553-568. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
M. Hennessy and H. Lin. Symbolic bisimulations. Theoretical Computer Science, 138(2):353–389, 1995.
C. N. Ip and D. L. Dill. Better verification through symmetry. Formal Methods in System Design: An International Journal, 9(1/2):41–75, 1996.
A. Jeffrey. A fully abstract semantics for a higher-order functional language with nondeterministic computation. Theoretical Computer Science, 228:105–150, 1999.
B. Jonsson and J. Parrow. Deciding bisimulation equivalences for a class of non-finite-state programs. Information and Computation, 107(2):272–302, 1993.
A. Jung and J. Tiuryn. A new characterization of lambda definability. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA’93), volume 664 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 245–257. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
R. Lazić. A Semantic Study of Data Independence with Applications to Model Checking. DPhil thesis, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, 1999.
R. Lazić and D. Nowak. A unifying approach to data-independence. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2000), volume 1877 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 581–595. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
R. Lazić and D. Nowak. On a semantic definition of data independence. Research report 392, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, 2003. http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk.
T. Nipkow. Non-deterministic data types: models and implementations. Acta Informatica, 22(6):629–661, 1986.
G. D. Plotkin. Lambda-definability in the full type hierarchy. In To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalism, pages 363–373. Academic Press, 1980.
S. Qadeer. Verifying sequential consistency on shared-memory multiprocessors by model checking. Research Report 176, Compaq, 2001.
R. Hojati and R. K. Brayton. Automatic datapath abstraction in hardware systems. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Computer Aided Verification, volume 939 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 98–113. Springer Verlag, 1995.
J. C. Reynolds. Types, abstraction and parametric polymorphism. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP World Computer Congress (IFIP’83), pages 513–523. North-Holland, 1983.
A. W. Roscoe and P. J. Broadfoot. Proving security protocols with model checkers by data independence techniques. Journal of Computer Security, Special Issue on the 11th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW11), pages 147–190, 1999.
P. Wolper. Expressing interesting properties of programs in propositional temporal logic. In Conference Record of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 184–193. ACM, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lazić, R., Nowak, D. (2003). On a Semantic Definition of Data Independence. In: Hofmann, M. (eds) Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications. TLCA 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2701. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44904-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44904-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40332-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44904-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive