“Atrium” — A Knowledge Model for Modern Security Forces in the Information and Terrorism Age

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2665)


Eighty percent of business process reengineering efforts have failed. This piece argues that the missing piece is an ability to see the newer technical systems conceptually integrated into an organization as well as functionally embedded. Similarly, a model of a modern military or security institution facing asymmetries in active security threats and dealing with extremely limited strategic depth needs to focus less on precision strikes and more on knowing what can be known in advance. Finding that most published designs and existing relations were based on rather static notions of accessing only explicitly collected knowledge, I turned to the development of an alternative socio-technical organizational design labeled the “Atrium” model based on the corporate hyperlinked model of Nonaka and Takeuchi. The rest of this work presents the basics of this model as applied to a military organization, though it could conceivably apply to any large scale security force.


Business Process Task Force Organizational Design Knowledge Model Implicit Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Benedikt, Michael. (1991). Cyberspace: First Steps. Boston, Massachusetts: the MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demchak, Chris C. (2001). “Knowledge Burden Management and a Networked Israeli Defense Force: Partial RMA in ‘Hyper Text Organization’?” Journal of Strategic Studies. 24:2 (June).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drucker, Peter F. (1959). Technology Management and Society. San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gleick, James. (1987). Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landau, Martin. (1973). “On the Concept of a Self-Correcting Organization.” Public Administration Review (November–December 1973).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nonaka, Ikujiro and Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1997). “A New Organizational Structure (Hyper-Text Organization).” In Prusak, Laurence, ed. 1997. Knowledge in Organizations. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. 99–133.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wheatley, Margaret J. (1992). Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco: Boerrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, James Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cyberspace Policy Research Group, School of Public Administration and PolicyUniversity of ArizonaTucson

Personalised recommendations