Advertisement

Enhancing the Valency Dictionary of Czech Verbs: Tectogrammatical Annotation

  • Hana Skoumalová
  • Markéta Straňáková-Lopatková
  • Zdeněk Žabokrtský
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2166)

Abstract

A syntactic lexicon of verbs with the subcategorization information is crucial for NLP. Two phases of creating such lexicon are presented. The first phase consists of the automatic preprocessing of source data—particular valency frames are proposed. Where it is possible, the functors are assigned, otherwise the set of possible functors is proposed. In the second phase the proposed valency frames are manually refined.

Keywords

Surface Realization Computational Linguistics Negative Clause Merging Phase Small Lexicon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Daneš, Fr., Hlavsa, Z.: Větné vzorce v češtině. Academia, Praha, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fillmore, C.J.: The Case for Case. In: Universals in Linguistic Theory (eds. E. Bach, R. Harms), New York, 1–90, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horák, A.: Verb valency and semantic classification of verbs. In: TSD’98 Proceedings (eds. Sojka, P., Matoušek, V., Pala, K., and Kopeček, I.), Masaryk University Press, Brno, pp.61–66, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kosek, J.: XML pro každého. Grada Publishing, Prague, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pala, K., Ševeček, P.: Valence českých sloves (Valency of Czech verbs). In: Sborník prací FFBU, volume A45, Masaryk University, Brno., pp. 41–54, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pala, K., Ševeček, P.: Final Report, June 1999, Final CD ROM on EWN1,2,LE4-8328, Amsterdam, September 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panevová, J: On Verbal Frames in Functional Generative Description. Part I, PBML 22, 1974, pp.3–40, Part II, PBML 23, pp. 17–52, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panevová, J.: Formy a funkce ve stavbě české věty. Academia, Praha, 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panevová, J: Valency Frames: Extension and Re-examination, 2001. (submitted)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panevová, J., Skoumalová, H.: Surface and deep cases. In: Proceedings of COLING’ 92, Nantes, pp. 885–889, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., Panevová, J.: The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects (ed. by J. Mey), Dordrecht:Reidel and Prague: Academia, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skoumalová, H.: Czech syntactic lexicon. PhD thesis, Charles University, Faculty of Arts, Prague. (submitted)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Straňáková, M.: Homonymie předložkových skupin a možnost jejího automatického zpracování, PhD thesis, MFF UK (submitted).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tesnière, L.: Elements de syntaxe structurale. Paris, 1959.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Žabokrtskí, Z.: Automatic Functor Assignment in the Prague Dependency Treebank. In: TSD2000 Proceedings, LNAI 1906, Springer-Verlag, pp. 45–50, 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hana Skoumalová
    • 1
  • Markéta Straňáková-Lopatková
    • 2
  • Zdeněk Žabokrtský
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical and Computational LinguisticsFF UKPrague
  2. 2.Center for Computational LinguisticsMFF UKPrague

Personalised recommendations