Digital Libraries in a Clinical Setting: Friend or Foe?

  • Anne Adams
  • Ann Blandford
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2163)

Abstract

Clinical requirements for quick accessibility to reputable, up-to-date information have increased the importance of web accessible digital libraries for this user community. To understand the social and organisational impacts of ward-accessible digital libraries (DLs) for clinicians, we conducted a study of clinicians’ perceptions of electronic information resources within a large London based hospital. The results highlight that although these resources appear to be a relatively innocuous means of information provision (i.e. no sensitive data) social and organisational issues can impede effective technology deployment. Clinical social structures, which produce information — and technology — hoarding behaviours can result from poor training, support and DL usability.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, A.: Multimedia information changes the whole privacy ballgame. in proceedings of computers freedom and privacy 2000: challenging the assumptions. ACM Press CHI Conference Publications. (2000) 25–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, A. & Sasse, M. A.: Privacy issues in ubiquitous multimedia environments: Wake sleeping dogs, or let them lie? In Proceedings of INTERACT’ 99, Edinburgh. (1999) 214–221Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams, A. & Sasse, M. A.: Taming the wolf in sheep’s clothing: privacy in multimedia communications. In Proceedings of ACM multimedia’ 99, Orlando. (1999) 101–107Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams, A. & Sasse, M. A.: The user is not the enemy. In Communications of ACM. (Dec. 1999) 40–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blandford, A., Stelmaszewska, H. & Bryan-Kinns, N.: Use of multiple digital libraries: a case study. To appear in Proc. JCDL 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Covi, L. & Kling, R.: Organisational dimensions of effective digital library use: Closed rational and open natural systems model. In Kiesler, S (ed) Culture of the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1997) 343–360Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gremy, F. and Bonnin, M.: Evaluation of automatic health information systems: what and how?, in Assessment and evaluation of information technologies. In Gennip, E. and Talmon, J.L. (eds.), “medicine van”. Amsterdam: IOS Press (1995) 9–20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grudin, J.: Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challengers for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37, (1994) 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison, G. S.: The Winchester experience with the TDS hospital information system British Journal of Urology, 67(5). (May, 1991) 532–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heathfield, H.: The rise and fall of expert systems in medicine. In Expert Systems, Vol. 16,No.3. (August 1999) 183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heathfield, H., Pitty, D. and Hanka, R.: Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges BMJ, 316, (1998) 1959–1961Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levy, S., Bradley, M. J. M., Swanston, M. T. and Wilson, S.: Power as a concept in the evaluation of telehealth. In Organisation development in health care: Strategies issues in health care management Rushmer, R. K., Davies, H. T. O., Tavakoli, M. and Malek, M. (eds). (2001) Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marchionini, G. Nolet, V. Williams, H. Ding, W. Beale Jr., J. Rose, A. Gordon, A. Enomoto, E. and Harbinson, L.: Content + Connectivity ⇒ Community: Digital Resources for a learning community. In proceedings of ACM digital Libraries (DL’97), Philadelphia, ACM Press. (1997) 212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McColl, A. & Roland, M.: Clinical governance in primary care: Knowledge and information for clinical governance. BMJ, 321, (2000) 871–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moody, D and Shanks, G.: Using knowledge management and the Internet to support evidence based practice. A medical case study, submitted to Australasian Conference on Information Systems. (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morgan, G.: Images of organization”. London: Sage (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richman, J.: Medicine and Health. London: Longman (1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, M., Haynes, B. & Richardson, S.: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312, (1996) 71–72Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sandellowski, M.: Culture, conceptive technology and nursing. International Journal of nursing studies, 36, (1999) 13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schneider, K. & Wagner, I.: Constructing the ‘Dossier Representatif’: Computer-based information sharing in French hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, (1993) 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schein, E.: Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, (1990) 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schiff, L., Van House, N. & Butler, M.: Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning. In proceedings of ACM digital Libraries (DL’97), Philadelphia, ACM Press (1997) 161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stevenson, C. & Cooper, N.: Qualitative and Quantitative research. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, April (1997) 159–160Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.: Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park. (1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Symon, G., Long, K & Ellis, J.: The Coordination of work activities: co-operation and conflict in a hospital context Computer supported cooperative work, 5(1) (1996) 1–31Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turner, B.: Medical Power and Social Knowledge. London: Sage (1987)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wyatt, J.: The clinical information access project, New South Wales: lessons from an NeLH precursor in proceedings of Advances in clinical knowledge management. Presented at ACKM 3 (2000) http://www.ucl.ac.uk/kmc/kmc2/News/ACKM/ackm3/wyatt.html

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Adams
    • 1
  • Ann Blandford
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DeptMiddlesex UniversityLondonU.K.

Personalised recommendations