Skip to main content

On the Differences between “Practical” and “Applied”

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithm Engineering (WAE 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1982))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The terms “practical” and “applied” are often used synonymously in our community. For the purpose of this talk I will assign more precise, distinct meanings to both terms (which are not intended to be ultimate definitions). More specifically, I will reserve the word “applied” for work whose crucial, central goal is finding a feasible, reasonable (e.g. economical) solution to a concrete real-world problem, which is requested by someone outside theoretical computer science for his or her own work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Gerards: Matching. In M.O. Ball, T.L. Magnanti, C.L. Monma, G.L. and Nemhauser (eds.): Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science 7, (Network Models), Elsevier, 1

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Hooker: Needed: An Empirical Science of Algorithms. Operations Research (1994), 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Hooker: Testing Heuristics: We Have It All Wrong. Journal of Heuristics (1995), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.A. Garey and D.S. Johnson: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.S. Johnson: A Theoretician’s Guide to the Experimental Analysis of Algorithms. http://www.research.att.com/~dsj/papers/exper.ps, 1996.

  6. H.F. Jackson, P.T. Boggs, S.G. Nash und S. Powell: Guidelines for Reporting Results of Computational Experiments-Report of the Ad Hoc Committee. Mathematical Programming (1991), 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.Y. Lee, J. Bard, M.L. Pinedo und W. Wilhelm: Guidelines for Reporting Computational Results in IIE Transactions. IEE Transactions (1993), 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. McGeoch: Analyzing Algorithms by Simulation: Variance Reduction Techniques and Simulation Speedups. ACM Computing Surveys (1992), 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. McGeoch: Toward an Experimental Method of Algorithm Simulation. INFORMS Journal on Computing (1996), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Moret: Experimental Algorithmics: Old Problems and New Directions. Slides of an invited lecture in: On-Line Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Algorithms Engineering (WAE’ 98), http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~wae98/PROCEEDINGS/.

  11. R.H. Möhring, M. Müller-Hannemann and K. Weihe: Mesh Refinement via Bidirected Flows-Modeling, Complexity, and Computational Results. Journal of the ACM 44 (1997), 395–426.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Müller-Hannemann and K. Weihe: On the Discrete Core of Quadrilateral Mesh Refinement. International Journal on Numerical Methods in Engineering (1999), 593–622.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Skiena: The Algorithm Design Manual. Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Weihe: Covering Trains by Stations or the Power of Data Reduction. On-Line Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Algorithms and Experiments (ALEX’ 98), http://rtm.science.unitn.it/alex98/proceedings.html.

  15. K. Weihe, U. Brandes, A. Liebers, M. Müller-Hannemann, D. Wagner, and T. Willhalm: Empirical Design of Geometric Algorithms. Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry (SCG’ 99), 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Weihe and T. Willhalm: Why CAD Data Repair Requires Discrete Techniques. On-Line Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Algorithms Engineering (WAE’ 98), http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/~wae98/PROCEEDINGS/.

  17. K. Weihe and T. Willhalm: Reconstructing the Topology of a CAD Model-A Discrete Approach. Algorithmica 26 (2000), 126–147.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weihe, K. (2001). On the Differences between “Practical” and “Applied”. In: Näher, S., Wagner, D. (eds) Algorithm Engineering. WAE 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44691-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44691-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42512-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44691-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics