Skip to main content

Converting Two—Way Nondeterministic Unary Automata into Simpler Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2001 (MFCS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2136))

  • 861 Accesses

Abstract

We show that, on inputs of length exceeding 5n 2, any n-state unary 2nfa (two-way nondeterministic finite automaton) can be simulated by a (2n+2)-state quasi sweeping 2nfa. Such a result, besides providing a “normal form” for 2nfa’s, enables us to get a subexponential simulation of unary 2nfa’s by 2dfa’s (two-way deterministic finite automata). In fact, we prove that any n-state unary 2nfa can be simulated by a 2dfa with O(n logn+4) states.

Supported by the Slovak Grant Agency for Science (VEGA) under contract #1/7465/20 “Combinatorial Structures and Complexity of Algorithms.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berman P., Lingas A.: On the complexity of regular languages in terms of finite automata. Tech. Report 304, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chrobak M.: Finite automata and unary languages. Theoretical Computer Science, 47 (1986) 149–58.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Geffert V.: Nondeterministic computations in sublogarithmic space and space constructibility. SIAM J. Computing, 20 (1991) 484–98.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hopcroft J., Ullman J.: Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mereghetti C., Pighizzini G.: Two-way automata simulations and unary languages. J. Aut., Lang. Comb., 5 (2000) 287–300.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Mereghetti C., Pighizzini G.: Optimal simulations between unary automata. SIAM J. Computing, 30 (2001) 1976–92.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Piterman N., VardiM. Y.: From bidirectionality to alternation. This Volume.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sakoda W., Sipser M.: Nondeterminism and the size of two-way finite automata. In Proc. 10th ACM Symp. Theory of Computing, 1978, pp. 275–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sipser M.: Lower bounds on the size of sweeping automata. J. Computer and System Science, 21 (1980) 195–202.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geffert, V., Mereghetti, C., Pighizzini, G. (2001). Converting Two—Way Nondeterministic Unary Automata into Simpler Automata. In: Sgall, J., Pultr, A., Kolman, P. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2001. MFCS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44683-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44683-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44683-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics