Skip to main content

PC-Trees vs. PQ-Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2108))

Abstract

A data structure called PC-tree is introduced as a generalization of PQ-trees. PC-trees were originally introduced in a planarity test of Shih and Hsu where they represent partial embeddings of planar graphs. PQ-trees were invented by Booth and Lueker to test the consecutive ones property in matrices. The original implementation of the PQ-tree algorithms by Booth and Lueker using nine templates in each bottom-up iteration is rather complicated. Also the complexity analysis is rather intricate. We give a very simple PC-tree algorithm with the following advantages: (1) it does not use any template; (2) it does all necessary operations at each iteration in one batch and does not involve the cumbersome bottom-up operation PC-trees can be used naturally to test the circular ones property in matrices. And the induced PQ-tree algorithm can considerably simplify Booth and Lueker’s modification of Lempel, Even and Cederbaum’s planarity test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.S. Booth and G.S. Lueker, Testing of the Consecutive Ones Property, Interval graphs, and Graph Planarity Using PQ-Tree Algorithms, J. Comptr. Syst. Sci. 13,3 (1976), 335–379.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D.R. Fulkerson and O.A. Gross, Incidence Matrices and Interval Graphs, Pacific Journal of Math., (1965), 15:835–855.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Golumbic, Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs, Academic Press, New York, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. P.N. Klein and J.H. Reif, An efficient parallel algorithm for planarity, J. of Computer and System Science 37, (1988), 190–246.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Korte and R.H. Möhring, An Incremental Linear-Time Algorithm for Recognizing Interval Graphs, SIAM J. Comput. 18, 1989, 68–81.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Lempel, S. Even and I. Cederbaum, An Algorithm for Planarity Testing of Graphs, Theory of Graphs, ed., P. Rosenstiehl, Gordon and Breach, New York, (1967), 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W.K. Shih and W.L. Hsu, Note A new planarity test, Theoretical Computer Science 223, (1999), 179–191.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hsu, WL. (2001). PC-Trees vs. PQ-Trees. In: Wang, J. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44679-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44679-6_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42494-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44679-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics