Skip to main content

Protein hydration varies with protein crowding and with applied pressure: a sedimentation velocity study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science ((PROGCOLLOID,volume 119))

Abstract

We have recently shown, using Derjaguin—Landau—Verwey—Overbeek theory, that the stability of protein solutions can be accounted for primarily in terms of the energy barrier presented by the bound water surrounding the protein, rather than by net repulsive forces. In further work we demonstrated experimentally, using precision densimetry and dynamic light scattering, that the amount of this water bound to proteins varies with temperature. We have now used the analytical ultracentrifuge (AUC) to study possible effects of crowding and applied hydrostatic pressure on water binding and hence on the sedimentation velocity of proteins. We show that whilst self-cancelling of effects minimises changes in the s values, there are predictions, which we are able to confirm experimentally, that both high protein concentration and elevated hydrostatic pressure at levels found in the AUC will lead to effects attributable to additional hydration. It is concluded that protein hydration is, over a range of conditions, a variable rather than a constant quantity. This finding is significant in relation to the stability and formulation of protein solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rowe AJ (2001) Biophys Chem (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schuck P (1998) Biophys J 75:1503–1512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rowe AJ (1977) Biopolymers 16:2595–2611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe AJ (1992) In: Harding SE, Rowe AJ, Horton JC (eds) Analytical ultra-centrifugation in biochemistry, poly mer science. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 394–406

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaplin M (2001) http://www.sbu.ac.uk/water/data.html

  6. Gross M, Jaenicke R (1994) Eur J Biochem 221:617–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho CH, Urquidi J, Robinson GW (1999) J Chem Phys 111:10171–10174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Philo JS (1977) Biophys J 72:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Philo JS (2000) Anal Biochem 279:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Holde KE, Weischet WO (1978) Biopolymers 17:1387–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Timasheff SN (1999) Adv Protein Chem 51:355–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

W. Borchard A. Straatmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Errington, N., Mistry, P., Rowe, A.J. (2002). Protein hydration varies with protein crowding and with applied pressure: a sedimentation velocity study. In: Borchard, W., Straatmann, A. (eds) Analytical Ultracentrifugation VI. Progress in Colloid and Polymer Science, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44672-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44672-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42489-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44672-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics