Skip to main content

Derandomizing Arthur-Merlin Games under Uniform Assumptions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1969))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study how the nondeterminism versus determinism problem and the time versus space problem are related to the problem of derandomization. In particular, we show two ways of derandomizing the complexity class AM under uniform assumptions, which was only known previously under non-uniform assumptions [13],[14]. First, we prove that either AM = NP or it appears to any nondeterministic polynomial time adversary that NP is contained in deterministic subexponential time infinitely often. This implies that to any nondeterministic polynomial time adversary, the graph non-isomorphism problem appears to have subexponential-size proofs infinitely often, the first nontrivial derandomization of this problem without any assumption. Next, we show that either all BPP = P, AM = NP, and PH ⊆ ⊕P hold, or for any t(n) = 2Ω(n), DTIME (t(n))DSPACE(t (n)) infinitely often for any constant > 0. Similar tradeoffs also hold for a whole range of parameters. This improves previous results [17]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. E. Andreev, A. E. F. Clement, and J. D. P. Rolim, Hitting sets derandomize BPP, Proceedings of the 23rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 357–368, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Buhrman, L. Fortnow, One-sided versus two-sided randomness, Proceedings of the 16th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, pages 100–109, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Babai, L. Fortnow, N. Nisan, and A. Wigderson, BPP has subexponential time simulations unless EXPTIME has publishable proofs, Computational Complexity, 3(4), pp 307–318, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Blum and S. Micali, How to generate cryptographically strong sequences of pseudo-rnadom bits, SIAM Journal on Computing, 13, pages 850–864, 1984.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Nisan and A. Wigderson, Hardness vs. randomness, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 49, pages 149–167, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hopcroft, W. Paul, and L. Valiant, On time versus space, Journal of ACM, 24, pages 332–337, 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Impagliazzo, R. Shaltiel, and A. Wigderson, Near optimal conversion of hardness into pseudo-randomness, Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 181–190, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Impagliazzo, R. Shaltiel, and A. Wigderson, Extractors and pseudo-random generators with optimal seed length, Proceedings of the 32th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1–10, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Impagliazzo and A. Wigderson, P=BPP if E requires exponential circuits: derandomizing the XOR lemma, Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 220–229, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Impagliazzo and A. Wigderson, Randomness vs. time: de-randomization under a uniform assumption, Proceedings of the 39th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 734–743, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Kabanets, Easiness assumptions and hardness tests: trading time for zero error, In Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. M. Karp and R. Lipton, Turing machines that take advices, L’Ensignment Mathematique, 28, pages 191–209, 1982.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Klivans and D. van Melkebeek, Graph nonisomorphism has subexponential size proofs unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses, Proceedings of the 31th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 659–667, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. B. Miltersen and N. V. Vinodchandran, Derandomizing Arthur-Merlin games using hitting sets, Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Papadimitriou, Computational Complexity, Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Saks, A. Srinivasan, and S. Zhou, Explicit OR-dispersers with polylogarithmic degree, Journal of ACM, 41(1), pages 123–154, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sipser, Expanders, randomness, or time vs. space, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 36, pages 379–383, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Sudan, L. Trevisan, and S. Vadhan, Pseudorandom generators without the XOR lemma, Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 537–546, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Toda, PP is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy, SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(5), pages 865–877, 1991. 312 C.-J. Lu

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Trevisan, Construction of near-optimal extractors using pseudo-random generators, Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 141–148, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Yao, Theory and applications of trapdoor functions, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 80–91, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, CJ. (2000). Derandomizing Arthur-Merlin Games under Uniform Assumptions. In: Goos, G., Hartmanis, J., van Leeuwen, J., Lee, D.T., Teng, SH. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40996-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics