Skip to main content

Learning Recursive Concepts with Anomalies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1968))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic study of inductive inference of indexable concept classes in learning scenarios in which the learner is successful if its final hypothesis describes a finite variant of the target concept - henceforth called learning with anomalies. As usual, we distinguish between learning from only positive data and learning from positive and negative data.

We investigate the following learning models: finite identification, conservative inference, set-driven learning, and behaviorally correct learning. In general, we focus our attention on the case that the number of allowed anomalies is finite but not a priori bounded. However, we also present a few sample results that affect the special case of learning with an a priori bounded number of anomalies. We provide characterizations of the corresponding models of learning with anomalies in terms of finite tell-tale sets. The varieties in the degree of recursiveness of the relevant tell-tale sets observed are already sufficient to quantify the differences in the corresponding models of learning with anomalies.

In addition, we study variants of incremental learning and derive a complete picture concerning the relation of all models of learning with and without anomalies mentioned above.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Angluin. Finding patterns common to a set of strings. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 21:46–62, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Angluin. Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control, 45:117–135, 1980.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G.R. Baliga, J. Case, and S. Jain. The synthesis of language learners. Information and Computation, 152:16–43, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bārzdiņnš. Two theorems on the limiting synthesis of functions. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs Vol. 1, pages 82–88, Latvian State University, 1974, (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Blum and M. Blum. Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Information and Control, 28:122–155, 1975.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Case and C. Lynes. Machine inductive inference and language identification. In Proc. 9th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 140, pages 107–115. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Case and C.H. Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science 25:193–220, 1983.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Case, S. Jain, S. Lange, and T. Zeugmann, Incremental concept learning for bounded data mining. Information and Computation 152:74–110, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Fulk. Prudence and other restrictions in formal language learning. Information and Computation, 85:1–11, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447–474, 1967.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Jain, D. Osherson, J. Royer, and A. Sharma. Systems that Learn-2nd Edition, An Introduction to Learning Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Lange and G. Grieser. On the strength of incremental learning. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1720, pages 118–131. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Lange and T. Zeugmann. Types of monotonic language learning and their characterization. In Proc. 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 377–390. ACM Press, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Lange and T. Zeugmann. Language learning in dependence on the space of hypotheses. In Proc. 6th Annual ACM Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pages 127–136. ACM Press, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Lange and T. Zeugmann. Incremental learning from positive data. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 53:88–103, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Lange and T. Zeugmann. Set-driven and rearrangement-independent learning of recursive languages. Mathematical Systems Theory, 29:599–634, 1996.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Tabe and T. Zeugmann. Two variations of inductive inference of languages from positive data. Technical Report RIFIS-TR-CS-105, Kyushu University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Wexler and P. Culicover. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Wiehagen. Limes-Erkennung rekursiver Funktionen durch spezielle Strategien. Journal of Information Processing and Cybernetics (EIK), 12:93–99, 1976.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Zeugmann and S. Lange. A guided tour across the boundaries of learning recursive languages. In K. P. Jantke and S. Lange, editors, Algorithmic Learning for Knowledge-Based Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 961, pages 190–258. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grieser, G., Lange, S., Zeugmann, T. (2000). Learning Recursive Concepts with Anomalies. In: Arimura, H., Jain, S., Sharma, A. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1968. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40992-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40992-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41237-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40992-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics