Skip to main content

On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1919))

Included in the following conference series:


This paper proposes a formal framework for argumentative dialogue systems with the possibility of counterargument. The framework allows for claiming, challenging, retracting and conceding propositions. It also allows for exchanging arguments and counterarguments for propo-sitions, by incorporating argument games for nonmonotonic logics. A key element of the framework is a precise definition of the notion of relevance of a move, which enables flexible yet well-behaved protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Modelling dialogues using argumentation.In Proceedings of the Fourt International Conference on MultiAgent SystemsBoston, MA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, D. Lowes, and A.M. McEnery. Using Toulmin’s argument schema to explain logic programs. Knowledge Based Systems, pages 177–183, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Brewka. Dynamic argument systems: a formal model of argumentation pro-cesses based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2000. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.F. Gordon. The Pleadings Game.An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Grasso, A. Cawsey, and R. Jones. Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2000. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.C. Hage, R.E. Leenes, and A.R. Lodder. Hard cases: a procedural approach.Artificial Intelligence and Law2:113–166, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.P. Loui. Process and policy: resource-bounded non-demonstrative reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 14:1–38, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.D. MacKenzie. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philo-sophical Logic, 8:117–133, 1979.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Maudet and D. Moore. Dialogue games for computer-supported collaborative argumentation. In Proceedings of t e Works op on Computer-Supported Col labo-rative Argumentation for Learning Communities, Stanford, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Parsons, C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8:261–292, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Praken. Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese, 2000. To appear in special issue on New Perpective in Dialogical Logics.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Prakken and G.A.W. Vreeswijk. Logical systems for defeasible argumenta-tion. In D. Gabbay, editor, Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2000. Second edition, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.A.W. Vreeswijk. The computational value of debate in defeasible reasoning. Argumentation, 9:305–341, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue.Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prakken, H. (2000). On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments. In: Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P., Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41131-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40006-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics