Advertisement

What’s in an Electronic Business Model?

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1937)

Abstract

An electronic business model is an important baseline for the development of e-commerce system applications. Essentially, it provides the design rationale for e-commerce systems from the business point of view. However, how an e-business model must be defined and specified is a largely open issue. Business decision makers tend to use the notion in a highly informal way, and usually there is a big gap between the business view and that of IT developers. Nevertheless, we show that conceptual modelling techniques from IT provide very useful tools for precisely pinning down what e-business models actually are, as well as for their structured specification. We therefore present a (lightweight) ontology of what should be in an e-business model. The key idea we propose and develop is that an e-business model ontology centers around the core concept of value, and expresses how value is created, interpreted and exchanged within a multi-party stakeholder network. Our e-business model ontology is part of a wider methodology for ebusiness modelling, called e3 -value, that is currently under development. It is based on a variety of industrial applications we are involved in, and it is illustrated by discussing a free Internet access service as an example.

Keywords

Business Model Internet Access Market Segment Valuation Function Composite Actor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.M. Akkermans, P.-H. Speel, and A. Ratcliffe. Problem, opportunity, and feasibility analysis for knowledge management: An industrial case study. In B. Gaines, R. Cremer, and M. Musen, editors, Proceedings 12th Int. Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, and Management KAW’99 (16–21 October 1999, Banff, Alberta, Canada), volume I, pages 2–1–1–2–1–22, Calgary, 1999. University of Calgary, SRDG Publications.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Boertjes, J.M. Akkermans, R. Gustavsson, and R. Kamphuis. Agents achieving customer satisfaction-theCOMFYcomfort management system. In Proceedings 5th Int. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology PAAM-2000 (Manchester, UK, 10–12 April 2000), pages 75–94, Blackpool, UK, 2000. The Practicalaplication Company Ltd. ISBN 1-902426-07-X.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.N. Borst, J.M. Akkermans, and J.L. Top. Engineering ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46:365–406, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soon-Yong Choi, Dale O Stahl, and Andrew B. Whinston. The economics of doing business in the electronic marketplace. Macmillan Technical Publishing, Indianapolis, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.H. Davidow and M.S. Malone. The virtual corporation-structuring and revitalizing the corporatio for the 21st century. HarperCollings, NewYork, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Fensel. Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, D, 2000. Series LNAI Vol., to appear.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.S. Fox and M. Gruninger. Enterprise modelling. AI Magazine, pages 109–121, Fall 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Gordijn, J.M. Akkermans, and J.C. van Vliet. Business modelling is not proces modelling. 2000. Accepted. Available from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~gordijn.
  9. 9.
    J. Gordijn, J.M. Akkermans, and J.C. van Vliet. Selling bits:A matter of creating consummer value. In First International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies ECWEB-2000 (Greenwich, UK, 4–6 September 2000, 2000. Accepted for publication. Available from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~gordijn.
  10. 10.
    J. Gordijn, J.M. Akkermans, and J.C. van Vliet.Value-based requirements creation for electronic commerce applications. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33), Los Alamitos, CA, January 4–7 2000. IEEE Computer Society. CD-ROM ISSN 0-7695-0493-0/00.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Gordijn, H. de Bruin, and J.M. Akkermans. Integral design of E-Commerce systems: Aligning the business with software architecture through scenarios. In H. de Bruin, editor, Proceedings Conference on ICT Architecture in the BeNeLux, Amsterdam, NL, 1999. Free University and Cap Gemini. Also available from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~gordijn.
  12. 12.
    R. Gustavsson. Agents with power. Communications of the ACM, 42:41–47, March 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris B. Holbrook. Consumer value: a framework for analysis and research. Routledge, NewYork, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Horrocks, D. Fensel, J. Broekstra, S. Decker, M. Erdmann, C. Goble, F. van Harmelen, M. Klein, S. Staab, and R. Studer. The ontology-based web inference layer OIL. Technical Report OnToKnowledge EU-IST Project Draft Deliverable, University of Manchester, UK, March 2000. Available from http://www.ontoknowledge.com/oil.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Hagel III and A.G. Armstrong. Net Gain-Expanding markets through virtual communities. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Jasper and M. Uschold. A framework for understanding and classifying ontology applications. In B. Gaines, R. Cremer, and M. Musen, editors, Proceedings 12th Int. Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, and Management KAW’99 (16–21 October 1999, Banff, Alberta, Canada), volume I, pages 4–9–1–4–9–20, Calgary, 1999. university of Calgary, SRDG Publications.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Kotler. Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation and control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Normann and R. Ramirez. Designing interactive strategy-From value chain to value constellation. JohnWiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.E. Porter and V.E. Millar. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, pages 149–160, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.Th. Schreiber, J.M. Akkermans, A.A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. Van Der Velde, and B.J Wielinga. Knowledge Engineering And Management. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000. 455 + xiv pages, ISBN 0-262-19300-0.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian. Information Rules. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Uschold, M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgios. The enterprise ontology. The knowledge engineering review, 13, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Ygge and J.M. Akkermans. Decentralized markets versus central control-a comparative study,. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:301–333, October 1999. Also available from http://www.jair.org.
  24. 24.
    F. Ygge, J.M. Akkermans, A. Andersson, M. Krejic, and E. Boertjes. The HomeBots system and field test-a multi-commodity market for predictive power load management. In Proceedings 4th Int. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology PAAM-99 (London, UK, 19–21 April 1999), pages 363–382, Blackpool, UK, 1999. The Practical Application Company Ltd. ISBN 1-902426-05-3. (Also available from http://www.enersearch.se/ygge).

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vuture.net -Amsterdam Centre for Electronic Business ResearchFree University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Deloitte & Touche Bakkenist Management ConsultantsDiemenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.AKMC Knowledge Management BVKoedijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations