Skip to main content

Supervised Interaction — A Form of Contract Management to Create Trust between Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2631))

Abstract

Supervised interaction is concerned with the problem of establishing trust between contracting agents in electronic markets. It is designed to put safeguards in place that ensure that errant behaviour in business transactions is either prevented or sanctioned. Supervised Interaction consists of three elements: an organisational framework, a contract specification language and a contract management protocol. The organisational framework emphasises the importance of introducing a trusted third party into any automated business transaction. The normative positions of the agents involved in an automated business transaction are explicitly expressed within the contracts that govern agents’ behaviour during supervised interaction. This interaction model is designed to provide the web of trust necessary for successful deployment of agent-mediated electronic markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feldman, S.: Electronic Marketplaces, IEEE Internet Computing, July/August (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS’95, San Francisco, (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, and Quantification, ICMAS’98 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.-H.: The Role of Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, Proc. 34th Hawaii Intl. Conf. On System Sciences (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cavedon, L., Sonenberg, L.: On social commitment, roles and preferred goals. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 80–86 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dellarocas, D.: Contractual Agent Societies: Negotiated Shared Context and Social Control in open Multi-agent Systems, 2000 Workshop on Institutions and Norms in MAS, Autonomous Agents 2000, Barcelona, Spain (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A., Cavedon, L.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI Agents, ICMAS 2000, pp.111–118 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Norman, T.J., O’Brian, P., Odgers, B.: Autonomous Agents for Business Process Management. International Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14(2):145–189 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N.R., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Faratin, P.: Automated Negotiation, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. On the practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (PAAM-2000), Manchester, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: On the Characterisation of Law and Computer Systems: The Normative Systems Perspective, In J.-J.Ch. Meyer, R.J. Wieringa (editors), Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power, Journal of the IGPL, 4(3), pp.429–445 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchil, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. In Artificial Intelligence, 104, pages 1–69 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindahl, L.: Position and Change, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland/Boston-U.S.A. (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh, S.P.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept, PhD Thesis, University of Stirling (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Noriega, P.: Agent Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor, PhD Thesis, Universitat Autonoma De Barcelona (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Norman, T.J., Reed, C.: Delegation and Responsibility, UKMAS 2000, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pacheco, O., Carmo, J.: A Role Based Model for the Normative Specification of Organized Collective Agency and Agents Interaction, Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, in press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, In Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3) 261–292 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pörn, I.: The Logic of Power, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender Systems, Commun. ACM, 40(3):56–58 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez, J.A., Noriega, P., Sierra, C., Padget, J.: FM96.5 A Java-based Electronic Auction House, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology PAAM-97 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sierra, C., Dignum, F.: Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce: Scientific and Technological Roadmap, In (F. Dignum and C. Sierra eds.) Agent-mediated Electronic commerce (The European AgentLink Perspective), LNAI 1991, pp. 1–18 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design. In Int Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(3) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: A social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities, Cooperative Information Agents, pp.154–165 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Supervised Interaction — Creating a Web of Trust for Contracting Agents in Electronic Environments, AAMAS’02, Bologna (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J. (2003). Supervised Interaction — A Form of Contract Management to Create Trust between Agents. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Korba, L., Singh, M. (eds) Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice. TRUST 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2631. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36609-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36609-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00988-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36609-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics