Skip to main content

The MOCA Platform

Simulating the Dynamics of Social Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II (MABS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2581))

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical model and a platform that allow to describe individual and collective recurrent patterns of behaviour, called respectively roles and organizations, and let agents dynamically choose to create, join or quit groups instanciating these patterns at execution time.

For an in-depth discussion about the necessity of including the methodological collectivism approaches (defended by R. Conte, S. Moss and B. Edmonds) and thus the modeling of social-scale phenomena in MABS see [11].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Norms as mental objects. from normative beliefs to normative goals. In Castelfranchi, C., Müller, J.P., eds.: From reaction to Cognition (MAAMAW’93). (1995) 186–196

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dignum, F. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (99) 69–79

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jennings, N.R. The Knowledge Engineering Review 8 (1993) 223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C., Treur, J. In Jennings, N., Lesperance, Y., eds.: Intelligent Agents VI (ATAL99), Springer-Verlag (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F.: Autonomous norm-accpetance. In Müller, J., Singh, M., Rao, A., eds.: Intelligent Agents V (ATAL98). (1999) 319–333

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E., Cavendon, L. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS2000), IEEE Computer Society (2000) 111–118

    Google Scholar 

  8. López y López, F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: A Framework for Agent Architecture, Dependence, Norms and Obligations. In: MAAMAW’2001. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hübner, J.F., ao Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Spécification structurelle, fonctionnelle et déontique d’organisations dans les sma. In Mathieu, P., Müller, J.P., eds.: Systèmes multi-agents et systèmes complexes, JFIASMA’02, Hermès (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert, N.: Emergence in social simulations. In Gilbert, N., Conte, R., eds.: Artificial Societies. UCL Press Limited (1995) 144–156

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conte, R., Edmonds, B., Moss, S., Sawyer, K.: Sociology and social theory in agent based social simulation: A symposium. Computational and Mathematical Organization 7 (2001) 183–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3 (2000) 285–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasser, L.: Social conceptions of knowledge and action: Dai foundations and open systems semantics. Artificial Intelligence 47 (1995) 107–138

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lea, D., Marlowe, J.: Psl: Protocols and pragmatics for open systems. Technical report, State University of New York (1995) available on ftp://g.oswego.edu/pub/papers/psl.ps.

  15. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: ICMAS’98, IEEE Computer Society (1998) 128–135

    Google Scholar 

  16. Durand, B.: Simulation multi-agents et épidémiologie opérationnelle. PhD thesis, Université de Caen (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hilaire, V.: Vers une approche de spécification, de prototypage et de vérification de systèmes multi-agents. PhD thesis, Université de Franche-Comté (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zack, M.H.: Researching organizational systems using social network analysis. In IEEE, ed.: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawai’i. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amblard, F.: MODELES MULTI-AGENTS POUR LA DECISION COLLECTIVE. Technical report, Université de Montpellier II (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. T.A.B, S.: Estimation on the basis of snowball samples: How to Weight. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 1 (1992) 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parunak, H., Odell, J.: Representing social structures in UML. In: Workshop Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, AOSE2001. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Panzarasa, P., Norman, T.J., Jennings, N.R.: Modeling sociality in the BDI framework. In: Proceedings of First Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT’99). (1999) 202–206

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kendall, E.: Role modelling for agents analysis, design and implementation. In: 1st ASA-3rd MA, Palm Springs, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barbuceanu, M., Gray, T., Mankovski, S.: Coordinating with obligations. In: Agents’98, Minneapolis (1998) 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Confirmation and joint actions. In: Proceedings of the twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’91, AAAI (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hannoun, M., Boissier, O., Sichman, J.S., Sayettat, C.: MOISE: Un modèle organisationnel pour la conception de systèmes multi-agents. In: JFIADSMA’99, Hermes (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castelfranchi, C.: Founding agent’s ‘autonomy’ on dependence theory. In: ECAI 2000, IOS Press (2000) 353–357

    Google Scholar 

  28. ao Sichman, J.S.: DEPINT: dependence-based coalition formation in an open multi-agent scenario. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fischer, K.: Agent-based design of holonic manufacturing systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 27 (1999) 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferraris, C., Martel, C.: Antigone, modélisation pour les activités conjointes: un méta-modéle pour les sma? In: JFIADSMA’99, Hermes (1999) 135–148

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ferraris, C., Martel, C.: Regulation in groupware, the example of a collaborative drawing tool for young children. In: 6th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2000), Madeira, Portugal (2000) 119–127

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: Operational semantics of a role-based agent architecture. In: ATAL’99. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lemaître, C., Excelente, C.B.: Multi-agent organization approach. In: Proceedings of the second Iberoamerican Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Agent systems, Toledo, Spain. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yoo, M.J.: Une approche componentielle pour la modélisation des agents coopérants et sa validation. PhD thesis, Université de Paris 6 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dury, A.: Modélisation des interactions dans les systèmes multi-agents. PhD thesis, Université Henri Poincaré (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ferber, J., Müller, J.P.: Influence and reaction: a model of situated multi-agent system. In: ICMAS’96, Kyoto, AAAI Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8 (1987) 231–274

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Harel, D., Naamad, A.: The Statemate Semantics of Statecharts. ACM Trans. Soft. Eng. Method. 4 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Duke, R., King, P., Rose, G., Smith, G.: The Object-Z specification Language. Technical report, Software Verification Research Center, Departement of Computer Science, University of Queensland, Australia (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Duke, R., Rose, G., Smith, G.: Object-Z: a specification language advocated for the description of standards. Technical Report 94-95, Software Verification Research Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Queensland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Amiguet, M., Müller, J.P.: Solving Role Conflicts in Organizational Models. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2002) submitted

    Google Scholar 

  42. Müller, J.P., Amiguet, M., Baez, J., Nagy, A.: La plate-forme MOCA: réification de la notion d’organisation au-dessus de madkit. In El Fallah Segrouchni, A., Magnin, L., eds.: JFIADSMA’01. (2001) 307–310

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amiguet, M., Müller, JP., Baez-Barranco, JA., Nagy, A. (2003). The MOCA Platform. In: Simão Sichman, J., Bousquet, F., Davidsson, P. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation II. MABS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2581. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36483-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00607-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36483-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics