Skip to main content

Assessment of User-Centred Design Processes - Lessons Learnt and Conclusions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2559))

Abstract

We carried out a series of case studies in industrial settings to learn how to perform effective assessments of user-centred design (UCD) processes. Our research strategy was to gather qualitative feedback from the organisations assessed, to understand how the different stakeholders perceive the assessments. We started with SPICE process assessment and a related UCD process model. Our observation was that the companies did not find traditional process assessment very useful. The approach and the related models were perceived difficult to understand, and not addressing ‘the right issues’. During further case studies, the assessment style evolved towards a different assessment approach. We conclude that there are different assessment situations where different approaches are needed. In the category of our focus - process performance assessment as a basis for process improvement - the focus should be on the substance of UCD rather than on the management of processes, and making the results make sense is more important than formal process capability ratings.

Called also human-centred design and usability engineering

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ISO/IEC, 13407 Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems. 1999: ISO/IEC 13407: 1999 (E).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering. 1993, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. 358.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Hix and Hartson, Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process. 1993: John Wiley & Sons. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer, H. and K. Holtzblatt, Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. 1998, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. 472.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mayhew, D.J., The Usability Engineering Lifecycle. 1999, San Fancisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum, S., J.A. Rohn, and J. Humburg. A Toolkit for Strategic Usability: Results from Workshops, Panels, and Surveys. in CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings. 2000. The Hague: ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bloomer, S. and S. Wolf. Successful Strategies for Selling Usability into Organizations. Tutorial 8. in CHI 99. 1999. Pittsburgh, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenbaum, S., J. Rohn, J. Humburg, S. Bloomer, K. Dye, J. Nielsen, D. Rinehart, and D. Wixon. What Makes Strategic Usability Fail? Lessons Learned from the Field. A panel. in CHI 99 Extended Abstracts. 1999. Pittsburgh, USA: ACM, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, R., Organisational Limits to HCI. Interview session. Conversations with Don Norman and Janice Rohn. Interactions, 2000. 7(2): p. 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bevan, N. and J. Earthy. Usability process improvement and maturity assessment. in IHM-HCI 2001. 2001. Lille, France: Cépaduès-Editions, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paulk, M., C. Weber, S. Carcia, M. Chrissis, and M. Bush, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. 1995: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuvaja, P., J. Similä, L. Kranik, A. Bicego, S. Saukkonen, and G. Koch, Software Process Assessment and Improvement-The BOOTSTRAP Approach. 1994, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/IEC, 15504-2 Software Process Assessment-Part 2: A reference model for processes and process capability. 1998: ISO/IEC TR 15504-2: 1998 (E).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jokela, T. Usability Capability Models-Review and Analysis. in People and Computers XIV-Usability or Else! Proceedings of HCI 2000. 2000. Sunderland, UK: Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC, 18529 Human-centred Lifecycle Process Descriptions. 2000: ISO/IEC TR 18529: 2000 (E).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jokela, T., N. Iivari, M. Nieminen, and K. Nevakivi. Developing A Usability Capability Assessment Approach through Experiments in Industrial Settings. in Joint Proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001. 2001: Springer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jokela, T. An Assessment Approach for User-Centred Design Processes. in Proceedings of EuroSPI 2001. 2001. Limerick: Limerick Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jokela, T., Assessment of user-centred design processes as a basis for improvement action. An experimental study in industrial settings. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, ed. J. Jokisaari. 2001, Oulu: Oulu University Press. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jokela, T. Making User-Centred Design Common Sense: Striving for An Unambiguous and Communicative UCD Process Model. in NordiCHI 2002. 2002. Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/TR15504-3, Software process assessment-Part 3: Performing an assessment. 1998, International Organization for Standardization, Genéve, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ISO/TR15504-4, Software process assessment-Part 4: Guide to performing assessments. 1998, International Organization for Standardization, Genéve, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  22. March, S.T. and G.F. Smith, Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decision Support Systems, 1995. 15(4): p. 251–266.SPICE, SPICE Phase 2 Trials Interim Report, Version 1.00. 1998, Available at http://www-sqi.cit.gu.edu.au/spice/. p. 172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jokela, T. (2002). Assessment of User-Centred Design Processes - Lessons Learnt and Conclusions. In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36209-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics