Skip to main content

Component Certification - What is the Value?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2559))

Abstract

Component-based software is becoming increasingly popular as a means to create value through improved integration across multiple parts of a plant or business. However, sometimes components that are supposed to be integrated cannot be integrated in the same way that the user envisions at time of acquiring the component. Certification of components is one way of ensuring that components adhere to certain standards for integration. This study presents findings from two case studies assessing the value of one particular certification program from ABB, called Industrial IT Enabled. A method for facilitating complex decision-making, Incomplete Pairwise Comparison (IPC), has been used to identify the relative value of Industrial IT Enabled for customers, as well as for ABB itself. Results indicate that the certification provides practically significant added value to customers, as well as to ABB. It is believed that these results, to some extent, can be valid in other similar certification programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bratthall, L., van der Geest, R., Hofmann, H., Jellum, E., Korendo, Z., Martinez, R., Orkiz, M., Zeidler, C., Andersson, J. A. „Integrating Hundreds of Products through One Architecture-The Industrial IT Architecture”. In Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bratthall, L., Runeson, P., Adelswärd, K., Eriksson, W. „A Survey of Lead-time Challenges in the Development and Evolution of Distributed Real-time Systems”. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 43, No. 13, pp. 947–58. 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carmone, F. J., Kara, A., Zanakis, S. H. „A Monte Carlo Investigation of Incomplete Pairwise Comparison Matrices in AHP”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 102, No. 3, pp 538–53. Nov. 1997

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Forman, E., Peniwati, K. „Aggregating Individual Judgements and Priorities with the Analytic Hierachy Process”. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol.108, No. 1, pp. 165–169. July, 1998

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D. Research Methods in the Social Sciences, Fourth Edition. St. Martin’s Press, United Kingdom. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harker, P. T. “Incomplete Pairwise Comparison in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 837–848. 1987

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Harker, P. T. “Alternative Modes of Questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 35, pp. 353–360. 1987

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. IEC Standard 61346: Structuring principles and reference designations. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. IEC Standard 61355: Classification and Designation of documents for plants, systems and equipment. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson, E., Bratthall, L., Wesslén, A., Höst, M. „A Survey on the Importance of Quality Requirements for Different Stakeholders in Software Architecture Development”. In Proc. 34rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34). January, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson, J., Ryan, K. „A Cost-Value Approach for Prioritizing Requirements”. IEEE Software, Vol. 14, No. 5. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miranda, E. „An evaluation of the paired comparison method for software sizing”. Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 597–604. Limerick, Ireland. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paulk, M. C., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Addison-Wesley. 1995

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty, T. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications. 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wohlin, C., von Mayrhauser, A. „Assessing Project Success using Subjective Evaluation Factors”. Accepted for publication in Software Quality Journal. 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bratthall, L., Hasselberg, J., Hoffman, B., Korendo, Z., Schilli, B., Gundersen, L. (2002). Component Certification - What is the Value?. In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00234-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36209-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics