Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Motion Signal Distributions Emerging from Locomotion through a Natural Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2525))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Some 50 years have passed since Gibson drew attention to the characteristic field of velocity vectors generated on the retina when an observer is moving through the three-dimensional world. Many theoretical, psychophysical, and physiological studies have demonstrated the use of such optic flowfields for a number of navigational tasks under laboratory conditions, but little is known about the actual flowfield structure under natural operating conditions. To study the motion information available to the visual system in the real world, we moved a panoramic imaging device outdoors on accurately defined paths and simulated a biologically inspired motion detector network to analyse the distribution of motion signals. We found that motion signals are sparsely distributed in space and that local directions can be ambiguous and noisy. Spatial or temporal integration would be required to retrieve reliable information on the local motion vectors. Nevertheless, a surprisingly simple algorithm can retrieve rather accurately the direction of heading from sparse and noisy motion signal maps without the need for such pooling. Our approach thus may help to assess the role of specific environmental and computational constraints in natural optic flow processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR. 1985. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of AmericaA 2:284–299.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adelson EH, Movshon JA. 1982. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 300:523–525.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borst A, Egelhaaf M. 1989. Principles of visual motion detection. Trends in Neuroscience 12:297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chahl JS, Srinivasan MV. 1997. Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging. Applied Optics 36:8275–8285.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dahmen HJ, Franz MO, Krapp HG. 2001. Extracting egomotion from optic flow: limits of accuracy and neural matched filters. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J, Editors. Motion Vision—Computational, Neural, and Ecological Constraints. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer. p 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dahmen HJ, Wüst RM, Zeil J. 1997. Extracting egomotion parameters from optic flow: principal limits for animals and machines. In: Srinivasan MV, Venkatesh S, Editors. From living eyes to seeing machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 174–198.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eckert MP, Zeil J. 2001. Towards an ecology of motion vision. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J, Editors. Motion Vision: Computational, neural and ecological constraints. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer Verlag. p 333–369.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franz MO, Krapp HG. 2000. Wide-field, motion-sensitive neurons and matched filters for optic flow fields. Biological Cybernetics 83:185-197.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frost BJ, Wylie DR, Wang Y-C. 1990. The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accesory optic pathways of birds. Vision Research 30:1677–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geisler WS. 1999. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature 400:65-69.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson JJ. 1950. The perception of the visual world. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hausen K, Egelhaaf M. 1989. Neural Mechanisms of Visual Course Control in Insects. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie RC, Editors. Facets of Vision. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. p 391–424.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heeger DJ. 1987. Model for the extraction of image flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4:1455–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hildreth E-C. 1984. The computation of the velocity field. Procedings of the Royal Society London B 221:189–220.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hildreth E-C, Koch C. 1987. The analysis of visual motion: From computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience 10:477–533.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston A, McOwan PW, Benton CP. 1999. Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Procedings of the Royal Society London B 266:509–518.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koenderink JJ, Van Doorn AJ. 1987. Facts on Optic Flow. Biological Cybernetics 56:247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krapp HG, Hengstenberg R. 1996. Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons. Nature 384:463–466.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Longuet-Higgins HC, Prazdny K. 1980. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Procedings of the Royal Society London B 208:385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nakayama K, Silverman GH. 1988. The aperture problem—II-Spatial integration of velocity information along contours. Vision Research 28:747–753.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nalbach H-O. 1990. Multisensory control of eyestalk orientation in decapod crustaceans: an ecological approach. Journal of Crustacean Biology 10:382–399.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nalbach H-O, Nalbach G. 1987. Distribution of optokinetic sensitivity over the eye of crabs: its relation to habitat and possible role in flow-field analysis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 160:127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  23. O'Carroll D, Laughlin SB, Bidwell NJ, Harris SJ. 1997. Spatio-Temporal Properties of Motion Detectors Matched to Low Image Velocities in Hovering Insects. Vision Research 37:3427–3439.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Orban GA, Lagae L, Verri A, Raiguel S, Xiao D, Maes H, Torre V. 1992. First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89:2595–2599.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Patzwahl DR, Zanker JM. 2000. Mechanisms for human motion perception: combining evidence from evoked potentials, behavioural performance and computational modelling. European Journal of Neuroscience 12:273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Perrone JA. 1992. Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9:177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reichardt W. 1987. Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A161:533–547.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reichardt W, Egelhaaf M. 1988. Properties of Individual Movement Detectors as Derived from Behavioural Experiments on the Visual System of the Fly. Biological Cybernetics 58:287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reichardt W, Schlögl RW. 1988. A two dimensional field theory for motion computation. First order approximation; translatory motion of rigid patterns. Biological Cybernetics 60:23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasan MV. 1990. Generalized Gradient Schemes for the Measurement of Two-Dimensional Image Motion. Biological Cybernetics 63:421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Santen JPH, Sperling G. 1985. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2:300–321.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verri A, Straforini M, Torre V. 1992. Computational aspects of motion perception in natural and artificial vision systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society [Biology] 337:429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watamaniuk SNJ, McKee SP. 1998. Simltaneous encoding of direction at a local and global scale. Perception and Psychophysics 60:191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ. 1985. Model of human visual-motion sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A2:322–342.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zanker JM. 2001. Combining Local Motion Signals: A Computational Study of Segmentation and Transparency. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J, Editors. Motion Vision: Computational, Neural and Ecological Constraints. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zanker JM, Hofmann MI, Zeil J. 1997. A two-dimensional motion detector model (2DMD) responding to artificial and natural image sequences. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 38:S 936.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zeil J, Voss R, Zanker JM. 1998. A View from the Cockpit of a Learning Wasp. In: Elsner N, Wehner R, Editors. Gottingen Neurobiology Report 1998. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag. p 140.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zeil J, Zanker JM. 1997. A Glimpse into Crabworld. Vision Research 37:3417–3426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zanker, J.M., Zeil, J. (2002). An Analysis of the Motion Signal Distributions Emerging from Locomotion through a Natural Environment. In: Bülthoff, H.H., Wallraven, C., Lee, SW., Poggio, T.A. (eds) Biologically Motivated Computer Vision. BMCV 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2525. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36181-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00174-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36181-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics